Data and studies. The fact you won't listen to him present his teams body of work shows how invested in a vaccine treatment you are. Ivermectin is safe, the Vaccine has already killed people.
Coronavirus: International Facts and Figures
- Thread starter Chief
- Start date
- Tagged users None
What??
I'm not disagreeing with him, or you.
I'm asking why I should believe him, as opposed to equally qualified people who disagree.
I'm also asking why you do.
What do you mean by 'data and studies'?
Even for me, who's level of expertise is limited to studying the Scientific Method when I did my Masters degree, that's very vague. I'm no expert whatsoever, but when someone says they believe someone because of 'data and studies' - I'm very skeptical that they have even the slightest clue WTF they're talking about.
Last edited:
Watch it and you'll know why I believe him. 29 dead in Norway alone from Vax.
Seriously? You believe something because you watched a Youtube video?
That's it? Seriously?
And you're screaming at people to 'smell the f$$cking coffee'?
You've got to be kidding me.
Where did you read that?
I'm not here to transcribe interviews just type Pierre Kory into youtube then click on his presentation to congress. Up to you. Was on CH9 news I rekn.
So you don't believe the Norwegian health officials that have claimed to have found no evidence of a link between the vaccine and the deaths?
They reckon they were all over 75 and were 'seriously ill' prior. Basically, they've said that the vaccine didn't do it.
See, I find this bitterly disappointing.
I'm very open minded. I don't trust the media, and I don't trust the government. The only think I trust less, is deadshits on the internet.
I don't trust the vaccinations at this stage - but I'm not anti-vaxer.
I seek out alternate views on what are considered accepted 'facts' and norms. However I get really, really frustrated when people with alternate views on things, turn out to have absolutely zero ******* clue what they're talking about, and are completely unable to present their view in a way that adds any value.
It gives me the shits to be honest.
The Doctor I have talked about is a heart lung specialist leading a team of people that could not be more qualified, the Senator who introduces him takes about a minute to list the guy's qualifications and professional CV.
Totally, I wouldn't trust a deadshit either, I agree with you there. Pierre Kory, actually Dr Pierre Kory to you and I is the polar opposite of a deadshit. If you find this bitterly disappointing, maybe there are some other underlying factors.
The further you go with this, the more I'm convinced that you are blindly believing something without understanding it even in the slightest.
Isn't that precisely what you were belittling others for doing?
It isn't that hard to understand. Watch it, then you can deviate from your deadshit induced bitter disappointment.
Ok so I watched it.
My opinion thus far has not changed one iota. In fact, it's strengthened it.
You have a qualified and apparently respected expert, citing particular studies and offering his informed conclusion.
You then literally spend 2 minutes on Google, and can find other qualified and apparently respected experts - that don't agree.
So again, I ask, why do you choose to be believe him? And I don't mean 'believe' in the sense that I'm suggesting he is dishonest, I mean why do you choose to believe his take on it?
I'm not saying I disagree with him (although the sample sizes from the trials do seem really, really small) - but I'm curious as to why you do?
How is this different to what you're hanging s**t on everyone else for doing?
Do you have an opinion on the Egyptian study that he has referenced at least?
If you don't agree with his data that is cool with me man. Have a gd day mate.
It's not his data.
He's referencing studies conducted by others.
Some of which, are really, really small samples.
That of course doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't work - but it also certainly does not mean "if politicians in the US and Australia don't use Ivermectin, it is no longer Covid19 killing people".
That's an absurd conclusion.
I don't even think he's advovating using it - but instead pushing for more studies into it.
Last edited:
It is amusing being called sheeple by someone like you. I will explain it simply for you:
The US is the most advanced and richest country in the world, with the resources at their disposal they should have been able to protect their population a lot better. This is not really a point of contention even amongst the wacky right.
No evidence ivermectin is a miracle drug against COVID-19
CLAIM: The antiparasitic drug ivermectin “has a miraculous effectiveness that obliterates” the transmission of COVID-19 and will prevent people from getting sick. AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. There’s no evidence ivermectin has been proven a safe or effective treatment against COVID-19. THE FACTS...
The right??? wtf mate, you are unhinged.
The fact a trial was run and successful 400 treated none got sick compared to 258 in the placebo group is already ahead of a vax with 90% efficacy and kills people. Interesting it hasn't been explored more.No evidence ivermectin is a miracle drug against COVID-19
CLAIM: The antiparasitic drug ivermectin “has a miraculous effectiveness that obliterates” the transmission of COVID-19 and will prevent people from getting sick. AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. There’s no evidence ivermectin has been proven a safe or effective treatment against COVID-19. THE FACTS...apnews.com
I'm sure you know all about it though.
Who has it killed?
Black white
Club Legend
- May 4, 2017
- 2,572
- 2,182
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Switzerland or Belgium would probably be the worst
I'm sure the 150$US a pop the pfizer vax sells for has nothing to do with the changes in reporting on SOME news outlets on the reported deaths.
Ivermectin really has the potential to be the wonder drug since there is another study where it has shown action to reduce viral RNA replication 5000 fold within the first 48 hours...what it needs is the approval of concerned medical groups like the NIH/FDA for it to pass and undergo immediate phase 3 clinical trials with an acceptable number of participants in a study. It didnt win a Nobel prize for nothing. The vaccines haven't even passed phase 3 clinical trials yet but dunces everywhere are hailing them the greatest thing ever.
The mind boggling amount of dollars involved is probably why it hasn't been done. Congress are more invested in vax than Ivermectin. If you still deny it's effectiveness then maybe it's time to don you bitterly disappointed cap and conclude our little interaction?
Have you read a single word I've written?
How can it's effectiveness be denied, or confirmed?
