- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Posts
- 933
- Reaction score
- 421
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Springfield Isotopes
I have the feeling that one of the factors considered in drafting Kreuzer at no.1, imo the better choice anyway, could have been Cotchin's injury doubts, and the fact Kreuzer has none!
I always thought Kreuzer would go no.1 purely based on speculation, but there were a few on this site like HBF and Gilly1972, who watched enough u/18's to feel that Cotchin was the better option, could this have been the difference? or is this not to serious?
"The Tigers have placed the exciting 17-year-old midfielder, the No.2 overall pick in last November's draft, on the long-term injury list, with a broken bone in his foot and Achilles tendon soreness".
http://www.afl.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/208/Default.aspx?newsId=55211
I always thought Kreuzer would go no.1 purely based on speculation, but there were a few on this site like HBF and Gilly1972, who watched enough u/18's to feel that Cotchin was the better option, could this have been the difference? or is this not to serious?
"The Tigers have placed the exciting 17-year-old midfielder, the No.2 overall pick in last November's draft, on the long-term injury list, with a broken bone in his foot and Achilles tendon soreness".
http://www.afl.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/208/Default.aspx?newsId=55211









