We've given a lot of consideration as to who our front six will be in 2010 and taken aboard an assumption that the back 6 will largely be "status quo"
Recent times have shown us that the odd surprise comes into play every now and then, and I also see 2010 being worked on to be the springboard into attack.
In order for us to devise such a game plan we will need a a back six that are smart, fluent, cohesive and prepared to run on at all costs ala Geelong.
I look back on this year and even taking into account the fact we had a fair share of injuries we also had a fair share of trialling personnel in various positions, which largely feel flat, and on reflection impeded progress of our better stock.
Our back six will need to work in harmony and be able to use the ball in a fashion which allows us to move forward quicker than the opposition can man up to.
Who are we going to use?
Who may be the newcomers to the back six in order to attain this run and carry required?
Can we expect any left fielders being thrown into the mix?
Recent times have shown us that the odd surprise comes into play every now and then, and I also see 2010 being worked on to be the springboard into attack.
In order for us to devise such a game plan we will need a a back six that are smart, fluent, cohesive and prepared to run on at all costs ala Geelong.
I look back on this year and even taking into account the fact we had a fair share of injuries we also had a fair share of trialling personnel in various positions, which largely feel flat, and on reflection impeded progress of our better stock.
Our back six will need to work in harmony and be able to use the ball in a fashion which allows us to move forward quicker than the opposition can man up to.
Who are we going to use?
Who may be the newcomers to the back six in order to attain this run and carry required?
Can we expect any left fielders being thrown into the mix?


