Remove this Banner Ad

Delistings

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

nananana catman

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Posts
3,866
Reaction score
853
Location
www.geelongblog.com
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
The Kent Kingsley Krew
okay ppls who are we gunna chop? i think itll be 2 maybe 3...
Has to be grgic and finnin will be close.. with daniel foster and maybe cam mooney running close for a placing..decisions have to be made ppl
 
Daniel Foster and Brent Grgic will be delisted.

Mooney, like i said earlier in the week, is happily contracted for another year.

Finnin, well, i like Ben, think he has a future and should be retained for at least another 1 or 2 seasons to prove his worth.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

We have to use 4 draft choices and given the quality of the pre season draft we would be mad not to have a selection there.
ON loats Haynes

OFF Woolnough , Lord , White all retired.

Street , Clarke traded.

I think Ben Graham goes on the vets list this year.Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Grgic can't possibly be kept on the list , he is out of contract so no problem . Danial Foster would have to be in trouble.
 
the list has 36 + either two veterens or Rookies on the main list (can somebody confirm this)

GONE
White
Woolnough
Lord
Clarke
Street
+ the uncontracted players (I believe there are only three now)
B. Girgic
D. Foster
J. Hunt
Total = 8

Nobody who has a contract can get delisted. ie Mooney and Rahilly.

ADDITIONS
Loats
Haynes
Pick 7
Pick 22
Blake
Pick 42
1 addition from the Rookie List (Smith or Byrnes)
Pick 5 in the Pre-season Draft
Total = 8

If we were to use pick 54 (4th round) then we would have to delist somebody else. Personally 4 picks in a weak draft is about all we need I think. Maybe we don't promote a rookie because both those guys can go around again next year as rookies.
 
Originally posted by BigCat1
1 addition from the Rookie List (Smith or Byrnes)
I've heard that Smith will be elevated, still not confirmed. Personally, I would prefer Byrnes though.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

feel free to correct me anyone, coz I am just writing this after a long boozy lunch

In straight numbers, Geelong has 38 players on it's list, 5 are confirmed gone, while 2 have been added. At the moment we have picks 7, 22, 38, 42 and 54. You must enter the draft with a maximum list size of 35, which is what Geelong has.

However there will be rookie promotions, at least Slade and probably one more (I wish Byrnes, but it may be Smith). Which means at least two more delistings, plus considering that we traded to get pick 42, we might as well use it, so that is another delisting. Also we will want to keep one position free for the preseason draft, so that is another delisting.

That means four players being delisted, Grigic, Foster and Hunt are all obvious candidates for the chop, but someone else will have to make way as well.
 
Pretty much spot on Jim. I forgot about Slade. I reckon he'd be lucky to be retained next year. We have a million HBF's

under AFL rules we have to use pick 42 that we got for WCE

You also forgot we have pick 5 in the preseason draft. Looks like there could be some handy players in that especially if a few guys from Brisbane get sqeezed out. I think we will definately be using our selection in that.
 
Trade week ins:

Loats
Haynes

Trade Week outs:

Street
Clarke

Likely Draft Selections:

Pick 7
Pick 22
Blake
Pick 42

Pre-season pick 5

So we need 5 delistings

Retirements:

Lord
Woolnough
White

Delistings:

Grgic
Foster

Nominated Rookie:

Byrnes

Discarded Rookie:

Slade :(

I'm another on the keep Hunt bandwagon. If we drop him from the senior list is it theoretically possible for him to be given a spot on the rookie list?
 
To be honest I think both Hunt and Slade may be kept. Byrnes doesn't need to be promoted just yet, while Slade does.

This is possible, because I think either Graham or Riccardi or both can be put down as veterans, creating one or two additional spots on the list.
 
Slade is a bit player, who has shown some promising signs, but by no stretch of the imagination is he a star.

Not a required player, for mine.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Slade is a hack. We must not keep him. I think it is between Hunt and him for a spot. We already have

David Johnson
James Rahilly
Milburn
Rooke
Sanderson
Tim Callan and more.

Get rid of Slade.
 
I'm not too concerned about promoting Byrnes just yet, as almost always a spot becomes available anyway through injury etc. I mean Slade got a gig easily enough.

The reason why I suggest keeping Slade, if Benny goes on to the veteran list, is that it is either Slade or a late pick in a draw that is being described as one of the shallowist in years, and I'd rather go with Slade rather some young hack who'll never play seniors ad get the chop at the earliest opportunity.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom