- Joined
- Dec 26, 2000
- Posts
- 1,916
- Reaction score
- 67
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Aston Villa
He's done nothing lately.
Give Jolly a go.
Give Jolly a go.
-
Guest - BigFooty Tipping 2026 - Get on! - $500 first prize - Weekly Prizes - Click to Join
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Drop Simmonds
- Thread starter BIG POPPA PUMP
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Totally agree
Totally agree. Simmo is good at the ruck contests but is hopeless around the ground. Once the ball goes to ground he is gone. He is no good up forward either. Jolly looks a much better prospect.
Totally agree. Simmo is good at the ruck contests but is hopeless around the ground. Once the ball goes to ground he is gone. He is no good up forward either. Jolly looks a much better prospect.
leave him alone....
he had 1 bad game....
can't say no one else has.........
GO DEES
he had 1 bad game....
can't say no one else has.........
GO DEES
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2000
- Posts
- 6,092
- Reaction score
- 173
- Location
- Half way between heaven and hell!
- Other Teams
- MELBOURNE DEMONS! :)
Simmonds does struggle a bit, but he is very important in the ruck and there is no way Jolly can replace him because Snake is a great ruckman.
He might be a bit scrapy on ground level but he is tall and he puts in 100% and sometimes thats enough.
Besides if Gerge is allowed to play why shouldn't Simmonds be allowed?
GO DEES!
He might be a bit scrapy on ground level but he is tall and he puts in 100% and sometimes thats enough.
Besides if Gerge is allowed to play why shouldn't Simmonds be allowed?
GO DEES!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2000
- Posts
- 3,631
- Reaction score
- 241
- Location
- melbourne
- Other Teams
- MELBOURNE DEMONS!!!
or, thats pretty funny!
i agree, he does give 100%, however he doesn't take a clean mark too ofen (SP?). if any one should be dropped, it's grgic!
GO DEES!!!
i agree, he does give 100%, however he doesn't take a clean mark too ofen (SP?). if any one should be dropped, it's grgic!
GO DEES!!!
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2000
- Posts
- 6,092
- Reaction score
- 173
- Location
- Half way between heaven and hell!
- Other Teams
- MELBOURNE DEMONS! :)
Well Simmonds got injured early in the game (thanks to Robbo's attempt to mark a ball and landing on his shoulder.... smart one 
) but he came back to play and rucked very well.
Seeing Jolly play in the VFL side yesterday i wasn't too impressed. Sure he was good early in the year but he is still developing. He wasn't even meant to play any senior games but Breese got injured.... (i know mish it's horrible
), he needs more time to develope.
Ok so Simmonds is not the greatest cleanest player but neither are the two Spiders (from North and Saints) and they still ruck and keep their position in the side. Having Whitey is a bonus because he can do both rucking and ground level work, but only the best ruckmans can do that and giving Simmonds time to develope will prove worth while.
GO DEES!
) but he came back to play and rucked very well.Seeing Jolly play in the VFL side yesterday i wasn't too impressed. Sure he was good early in the year but he is still developing. He wasn't even meant to play any senior games but Breese got injured.... (i know mish it's horrible
), he needs more time to develope. Ok so Simmonds is not the greatest cleanest player but neither are the two Spiders (from North and Saints) and they still ruck and keep their position in the side. Having Whitey is a bonus because he can do both rucking and ground level work, but only the best ruckmans can do that and giving Simmonds time to develope will prove worth while.
GO DEES!
From what I have seen Jolly still looks a better prospect. Better around the ground which is important. Simmonds is no good around the ground. I remmember yesterday he dropped an easy mark in front of the interchange bench which costs us dearly.