Remove this Banner Ad

ESPN Cricinfo Awards

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Posts
2,815
Reaction score
86
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
These were released about two weeks or so ago.

ESPNCricinfo Awards (note they are for individual performances)

Test batting: Sehwag (293 against Sri Lanka)
Test bowling: Taylor (5/11 against England)

ODI batting: Tendulkar (175 against Australia)
ODI bowling: Afridi (6/38 against Australia)

Twenty20 batting: Gayle (88 against Australia in WC)
Twenty20 bowling: Gul (5/6 against New Zealand in WC

Also there was a Statsguru category with awards based purely on statistics using a formula and no jury.

Batsmen of the year: Gambhir
Bowler of the year: Broad

Test batsmen of the year: Gambhir
Test bowler of the year: Johnson

ODI batsmen of the year: Sehwag
ODI bowler of the year: Anderson

Most consistent Test batsmen: Watson
Most runs in Test wins: Dilshan
ODI opening batting pair of the year: McCullum/Ryder

http://www.cricinfo.com/awards2009/content/story/448835.html

Interesting to also note they did a readers vote and they came up with the same results barring the Twenty20 performance of the year which they gave to Dilshan's 96* against WI in the WC.

http://www.cricinfo.com/awards2009/content/story/448897.html

Comments?
 
I thought Dilshan's 160 chasing India's 419 was more worthy than Tendulkar's 175. Tendulkar had the game and gave it back.
 
Anything to run down Tendulkar or put everything he does down. He has an average of 90 in his last 11 innings. Only a legend can play 21 years of top fligh sport and still break 95% of records.
 
Anything to run down Tendulkar or put everything he does down. He has an average of 90 in his last 11 innings. Only a legend can play 21 years of top fligh sport and still break 95% of records.

What does that have to do with the games mentioned?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Coventry's 194 not out and Iqbal's 150 in the same match were more deserving as well, but hey two minnows play, no one gives a crap.
 
Exactly, you're bias towards Tendulkar in a dead rubber but can't accept three innings that all took place in a live series that were all equally credible.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom