The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #26
Workplace Health & Safety
The Law Facebook pornography
- Thread starter The Old Dark Navy's
- Start date
- Tagged users None
By putting Facebook on the blacklist? That would go down a treat.
You won't find too many convictions around for people who inadvertantly accessed illegal material in that way. Even though the "I wasn't looking for it, it was just in something else I was looking at" is the usual defence offered, check a little deeper into most cases and you'll find that the offending material had usually been copied to a disc or thumb drive, or somehow permanently stored in cases where charges were laid.
Breaking rules 1&2 there /b/ro
GeorgeGrljusich
Club Legend
- Banned
- #31
Are these Fight Club type rules?
GeorgeGrljusich
Club Legend
- Banned
- #33
So that's who f***ing hacked me last week.
juddsentant517
Club Legend
wouldnt the guilty mind, guilty act (rea something and something else) come into play, if you didn't have guilty intentions, you are innocent
Not necessarily. There are plenty of offences where intent is not an element of the offence.
Yes it was 4chan, (inb4 HUURRRR DUURRRRR 1&2 newfag)
And no they had no reason to do it, they just did it for the lols.
To get their name in the papers and it worked.
I think that a facebook page is hardly a classy and sacred memorial anyway.
I am not sure who said it but it is akin to holding a wake at a strip club, and then complain that the strippers are not being respectful.
And no they had no reason to do it, they just did it for the lols.
To get their name in the papers and it worked.
I think that a facebook page is hardly a classy and sacred memorial anyway.
I am not sure who said it but it is akin to holding a wake at a strip club, and then complain that the strippers are not being respectful.
In the context of obscene pictures on a facebook page, wouldn't it be hard for the police to prove mens rea, that someone actually had the intent of viewing said child pr0n or other objectionable material?
actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea
True, but 4chan had hit at least four or five tribute pages before the latest one, you'd think people would stop making them.
And you'd be surprised at what percentage of controversial content on the internet can be attributed to 4chan, directly or indirectly.
Unless you frequent chatrooms/forums you wouldn't have a clue 4chan existed. Which would include the majority.
A large percentage?
Take everything on the internet and divide it by 4chans contribution.
I know that, I am just wondering when people will stop being outraged at these sites being trashed.
brb, calculating.
Well, think about it. If you were a facebook user and naive to chatrooms then you're going to be outraged when a group of people trash your memorial facebook page with child pr0n. I think you can expect people will always be outraged, which is why there will always be sites like 4chan. It may be there only op to get some attention.
I reckon they generally only do it for their own entertainment, if it gets ebaumsworld in the papers, then that's just a bonus
