- Joined
- Aug 24, 2000
- Posts
- 3,255
- Reaction score
- 3,032
- Location
- Wendouree
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- KC Chiefs, Royal Park FNC, Man City
Rejected in favour of two clubs - collingwood and Carlton - which have done virtually nothing to promote women's footy so far.
Either:
a) the club isn't interested or serious about this, but put in a bid anyway to appear "progressive";
b) our bid was poor and/or not professional enough to beat collingwood or Carlton's bids; or,
c) the AFL still believes collingwood and/or Carlton have more valuable brands than Richmond's.
Being "awarded" a provisional licence for 2018 is embarrassing. Frankly, we have been made look like a second-rate franchise. Even Essendon avoided this indignity. Despite being a long-time supporter of women's footy in country Victoria (as a sports reporter) part of me is inclined to hope the club tells the AFL to **** off. Only part of me, I should add.
I don't know which of the three alternatives I mentioned is the least unpalatable. Either way I think this is disgraceful.
Either:
a) the club isn't interested or serious about this, but put in a bid anyway to appear "progressive";
b) our bid was poor and/or not professional enough to beat collingwood or Carlton's bids; or,
c) the AFL still believes collingwood and/or Carlton have more valuable brands than Richmond's.
Being "awarded" a provisional licence for 2018 is embarrassing. Frankly, we have been made look like a second-rate franchise. Even Essendon avoided this indignity. Despite being a long-time supporter of women's footy in country Victoria (as a sports reporter) part of me is inclined to hope the club tells the AFL to **** off. Only part of me, I should add.
I don't know which of the three alternatives I mentioned is the least unpalatable. Either way I think this is disgraceful.
Last edited:









