-
LIVE: Brisbane Lions v Collingwood - Rd 4 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Lions at 67% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 4
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
3 Winner: evans1863
Frodo
- Thread starter ShAdOw
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
F
Fall Out Boy
Guest
You are a sad man Frodo 
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2001
- Posts
- 3,544
- Reaction score
- 2
- Location
- Beach on Indian Ocean
- Other Teams
- West Coast Eagles
Didn't know that board was there - doesn't say he's been banned for a week, but may be. How do you know if someone's been banned?
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2001
- Posts
- 2,212
- Reaction score
- 45
- Location
- Around here.....
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Hawthorn
Bluey posted a thread explaining that Frodo was gone for one week.
See general talk boards I think??
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Was he really banned for that 'for sale' thread?
Didn't seem too bad to me.
I didn't even get the joke.
I'm a little slow.
Didn't seem too bad to me.
I didn't even get the joke.
I'm a little slow.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2001
- Posts
- 3,544
- Reaction score
- 2
- Location
- Beach on Indian Ocean
- Other Teams
- West Coast Eagles
sabre's view on the Frodo incident:
"Ok the tribunal (Bluey) was faced with another test here.Yes Frodo's intent was only for the Mantis and yes his actions warrant a suspension. But Mantis did not leave the Bigfooty board bleeding, and by all accounts Mantis put in a grade A effort for acting. Frodo struck her with his mouth open with minimal force.
In my opinion it isnt much different to the suzi olsen incident. And so will Bluey walk away from this with his conscience intact? Or will the same old hierachy bring the same old biased view?
Well, now we know, a one week suspension. It's harsh, but I guess I can live with that"
Names changed to protect the biased.
"Ok the tribunal (Bluey) was faced with another test here.Yes Frodo's intent was only for the Mantis and yes his actions warrant a suspension. But Mantis did not leave the Bigfooty board bleeding, and by all accounts Mantis put in a grade A effort for acting. Frodo struck her with his mouth open with minimal force.
In my opinion it isnt much different to the suzi olsen incident. And so will Bluey walk away from this with his conscience intact? Or will the same old hierachy bring the same old biased view?
Well, now we know, a one week suspension. It's harsh, but I guess I can live with that"
Names changed to protect the biased.
F
Fall Out Boy
Guest
Originally posted by TheRealBuzz
Was he really banned for that 'for sale' thread?
Didn't seem too bad to me.
I didn't even get the joke.
I'm a little slow.
Methinks that was the straw that broke the proverbial camels back.
If you have a look through the suggestions board you will see why Bluey has taken a dislike to Frodo, his refusal to accept the chatmaster is behind it.
Other, less mature people, after arguing for a while accepted the fact that the chatmaster is here to stay, Frodo chose to act like a two year old who had his rattle taken off him (which, seriously is so unlike Frodo, who is usually an intelligent poster).
Oh and another reason is his numerous identities, like Shadow for instance
Originally posted by TheRealBuzz
Was he really banned for that 'for sale' thread?
Didn't seem too bad to me.
I didn't even get the joke.
I'm a little slow.
Frods and mantis (aka WWW and sandie) have been arguing for bloody ages. They hate each other and act like bloody 5 year olds towards each other. It's been going on for more than a year now and I guess Bluey had enough. I don't see why mantis wasn't banned as well though...
King ofthe Mark
Draftee
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2002
- Posts
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes, but be serious. At the early stages there was real nastiness when Mantis was telling Frodo and Asgardian to 'get cancer and die' etc, but it tamed down to the nth degree. Frodo's post was really quite a humorous troll and Mantis's reply was jovial too. No-one complained (how could anyone complain about either of the posts) and the only person who took offence was Bluey. Yea the Frodo/ mantis thing is a bit immature but as long as it is not harmful a bit of tomfoolery is okay, surely. It proves that Bluey's agenda was nothing to do with the posts or Mantis......it goes to chatmaster and a bit deeper. I'm certain that Frodo would not have wished that Mantis was banned. Her post was fine in his opinion.
ps I am told Frodo has a new identity which no one could possibly guess
. But Shadow is not one of them. Shadow is truly one of Frodo's sons although he was apparently sitting next to him when this thread was started and Shadow is an Eagles member who goes to all home games with Frodo and his wife.ps King ofthe Mark...any guesses whre the name comes from?
- Staff
- #10
LOL
Well dont VOR
I must admit I was almost about to abuse you for miss quoting me, untill I read it again and realised it was in good fun.
Now I am not sure of the story.How bout I fill you in when I find out.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2000
- Posts
- 77,200
- Reaction score
- 26,528
- Location
- Perth, Australia
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
Well i cant comment...havent seen the thread where this all took place...will comment further once i have read the evidence
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2001
- Posts
- 8,656
- Reaction score
- 3,191
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Swan Districts
Politics.....
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2001
- Posts
- 3,544
- Reaction score
- 2
- Location
- Beach on Indian Ocean
- Other Teams
- West Coast Eagles
My guesses:
- it's because you felt that you were on the mark, rather than over the mark, in your remarks to Mantis
- it's something in one of those Star Wars / Lord of the Rings sagas that I'm not aware of (Secret Society of the Mark or something)
