Conspiracy Theory Gravity Does Not Exist

[exe ex machina]

Newton’s Theory, that’s all it is -- a theory. There is nothing that conclusively proves the gravity exists.

Newton’s Theory is basically that we are stuck to earth due to a magnetic force or an attraction of sorts.

This would make sense if we didn’t have MASS or G-FORCE on planet earth. Mass and G-Force disprove Newton's Theory.

It is simple enough to prove that gravity is not keeping us on the Earth...

Experiment One:
Get a magnet of a sensible size and place some objects onto a table. Start with something small like paper clips and gradually work up in mass to something heavy like a bike. Place the magnet over the paper clip, you will see the magnet drags it off the table with ease -- a very strong gravitational force. Then work your way along the objects from smaller lighter items to larger heavier items and you will discover something. The magnetic field is far more powerful on smaller items of less mass, whilst the heavier larger mass items are barely affected by the magnetic field -- they wont be lifted from the table.

Experiment Two:
Find a large open area such as a field and take the same items you used for the table experiment with you. Start with the heavier larger mass items and stick them to the magnet. Now hold the magnet in your hand and spin around as fast as you can. You will see the heavier larger mass items easily drop off the magnet even at slow speeds, yet the lighter less mass items such as a paper clip will stick to the magnet regardless of how fast you spin.

By doing this experiment you will understand that items of high mass are much easier to lose gravitational pull than items of less mass.

Now apply this experiment to the planet Earth. Remember, the Earth is supposedly spinning at extremely high speeds. So bearing in mind your two experiments and the supposed laws of gravity, what items should be easier to pull away from the gravity of Earth? The heavier larger mass items should succumb to the G-force.

So why is it that gravity is not acting as it should? Surely, the smaller less mass items on Earth should be nearly impossible to lift due to the gravitational pull, and the larger heavier mass items should be easy to fling off. Yet, as we saw in the two experiments, the opposite is the case.

Turn a bike upside down, place water on the back wheel, then turn the pedals and watch as the water is propelled and displaced away from the tire. Now try this with heavier mass items such as soil and mud. You will see it leaves the tire even faster as it has more mass and is propelled by G-force.

So, you can’t have G-force and gravitational pull working against each other as it wouldn’t work.

The larger and heavier the item on Earth, the lighter it would be with G-force, (the Earth spinning) as G-force is flinging such items away off it. Yet, if we go with the immense pull of gravity, then the smaller lighter mass items on Earth would be impossible to fling off.

-------

Explanation of G-force: http://www.gforces.net/what-is-g-force-meaning.html

 

[Boston tiger]

-------

Explanation of G-force: http://www.gforces.net/what-is-g-force-meaning.html

I'm no scientist but why are you using magnets ?

 

[exe ex machina]

I'm no scientist but why are you using magnets ?

That is analogous to the theory of gravity. A Force of Attraction... larger bodies drawing smaller bodies in. Sun gravitationally pulls planets in (yet knows to keep them at a distance), planets drawing moons in (yet knows to keep them at a distance), earth drawing everything here down to its center, etc.

 

[darthbards]

The management at LIGO are generally felt to be the biggest frauds in the scientific community.
The only reason science hangs onto the notion of gravity is because so much of the mythamatics of science relies on it.

 

[darthbards]

http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/davesmith_au08/060708_more_lies_from_ligo.htm

 

[darthbards]

A step by step guide to how the scientific process works....the social media review process,it's not perfect but it really is all we've got.
Here's your Majik Gravity people
https://www.theguardian.com/science...ational-wave-detection-could-be-a-false-alarm

 

[Boston tiger]

-------

Explanation of G-force: http://www.gforces.net/what-is-g-force-meaning.html

I don't think the spin of the earth is faster enough to fling much off. It only goes around once every 24 hours.

 

[exe ex machina]

1,000 miles an hour is very fast. That's like 16+ times faster than a missile flies. (Haven't fact-checked the math on that)

 

[Snake_Baker]

1,000 miles an hour is very fast. That's like 16+ times faster than a missile flies. (Haven't fact-checked the math on that)

 

[Snake_Baker]

As for the lack of gravity stuff, I suppose that we are just lucky that all this mass came together by pure chance to form a planet.

 

[darthbards]

Thousands of scientists work at LIGO but it only took four to pull off this stunt and the whole world listened until they were found out to be the true frauds that they are.

 

[exe ex machina]

Thousands of scientists work at LIGO but it only took four to pull off this stunt and the whole world listened until they were found out to be the true frauds that they are.

Punishing video

 

[darthbards]

Punishing video

When LIGO hear a chirp they then scientifically Tweet,oh the ironing.
Chirp chirp,tweet tweet...that will be $620mil a year thanks sheeple.

 

[darthbards]

A look at how many of the religion of sciences faiths have to be put together to keep the myth of gravity going.

 

[darthbards]

Seriously,why isn't the management from LIGO behind bars in a jail cell for their enormous self injected scam. Self injecting results so funding continues and just in time for Nobel Prize nominations.
Announcements to the world followed by a simple we're sorry,that was unfortunate?

 

[exe ex machina]

darthbards if you were a boxer you'd be Iron Mike, so many punishing devestating blows.

 

[darthbards]

darthbards if you were a boxer you'd be Iron Mike, so many punishing devestating blows.

Here's a couple of the high priests of the religion of science talking what is known as jibberish.
Give these answers in grade six and you should be given a fail.
Listen to the great fraud Larry Krauss and tell me this bozo isn't a genuine threat to society who belongs behind bars.

 

[Present Not Past]

1,000 miles an hour is very fast. That's like 16+ times faster than a missile flies. (Haven't fact-checked the math on that)

Terminal velocity for an ICBM is 18,000 kms/h.

 

[RedStarUncle]

So... without even wanting to get into a debate about whether gravity is real or not...

The OP experiment doesn't make sense, as gravitational force is NOT magnetic force. That's the whole point of gravity - it explains attraction between non-magnetic bodies (whether you accept the theory of gravity as being attraction between two masses based on the size and distance between those masses is irrelevant to whether gravity is the same as magnetism).


In both the experiments described, the magnetic force being applied is effectively working AGAINST gravity (or... whatever force causes things to fall downwards... and I don't think anyone is denying that things fall down) and other forces.



So... without even saying that gravity is real or exists... all these experiments demonstrate is that 1) gravity is not magnetism and 2) when you use magnets on Earth, there are other forces acting on the magnetic object.

 

[exe ex machina]

Magnets in experiments is analogous not literal application

 

[exe ex machina]

Terminal velocity for an ICBM is 18,000 kms/h.

So i was close

 

[RedStarUncle]

Magnets in experiments is analogous not literal application

That may well be the case... but it's not perfectly analogous as the mathematical equations for magnetic attraction are different to those of gravitational attraction. Gravity is dependent on the mass of two bodies and distance between them, whereas magnetic attraction is slightly more complex based on the magnetic field created by the magnetised material.

But regardless of this... the failing is that in the experiments described, the magnet is applying a force to the object which also has numerous other forces acting upon it (gravity/whatever the force is that causes things to fall down, frictional forces, centripetal forces, air pressure, etc. could all be part of what we observe with the magnetic experiment).

In the first describe experiment assuming you are lifting the object directly "up" with the magnet, then it is gravity/whatever that you are overcoming and we know larger objects require more force to overcome the gravity/whatever force and so the magnetic force would need to be greater. In the second experiment it's probably a weakening of the magnetic attraction due to the centripetal forces/air resistance/something... but certainly it would only be analogous to gravity between an object and Earth if there was another significant attractive force being applied.

So for example... if there was a big dense sun not that far from the Earth and a car drove off a cliff... maybe the car would float in air a noticeable amount of time due to the attraction to the sun whereas a smaller object would appear to instantly fall due to the smaller alternate force... but there is no comparable alternate force to gravity so we don't see that and so it's not equivalent to the described magnetic experiment.



And again... none of that assumes gravity as an attraction between two masses it just assumes that SOMETHING causes objects to fall towards the Earth's surface.

 

[Boston tiger]

1,000 miles an hour is very fast. That's like 16+ times faster than a missile flies. (Haven't fact-checked the math on that)

"The earth is not rotating at an amazing speed if it thinks it’s going to throw us off into space. It’s rather a puny effort. It takes a whole day for it to turn around once. That’s just too slow. Now if only it could muster some effort and get turning every couple of hours, then it would start to throws things off its surface. Of course, it would also throw off it’s surface. If it managed to hold together at that point, then that would be amazing." Kim Aaron PhD in fluid dynamics.

 

[Total Power]

Terminal velocity for an ICBM is 18,000 kms/h.

wrong board for stating facts

 

[darthbards]

wrong board for stating facts

Tweet tweet.