Houston, you will have problems.

[WakeUpPies]

all yao can do is score and do freakin turnaround fadeaways, freakin 7 ft 6 toughen up and get some rebounds, then he will be a good player, but he is still the best center in the league

houston did not need francis, him, james and rafer will keep brooks on the bench and this is not a good thing

 

[eathb]

AI is like the best point guard.

AI is the current best point guard still playing.

 

[Dal-Las Mav'a Riq]

AI is the current best point guard still playing.

Damn according to you AI is the best PG, Carmelo is the best scorer and Nene would not be traded for LeBron.

Funny how you haven't made it past the first round since...since...uhhhm...94?

 

[eathb]

Damn according to you AI is the best PG, Carmelo is the best scorer and Nene would not be traded for LeBron.

Funny how you haven't made it past the first round since...since...uhhhm...94?

Name a better PG, that still plays

EDIT: Also both Nugs and Mavs don't have a ring yet... so it means nothing

 

[WakeUpPies]

still reckon arenas is better than AI

 

[eathb]

Arenas
HoF Monitor: 83
All-Star Selections: 3 (2005-2007, 1 start)
All-NBA Second Team: 1 (2007)
All-NBA Third Team: 2 (2005, 2006)
Most Improved Player: 1 (2003)

Allen Iverson
HoF Monitor: 237 (21st all-time, 5th among PGs)
Most Valuable Player: 1 (2001)
All-Star selections: 8 (2000-2007, 7 starts)
All-Star Game MVP: 2 (2001, 2005)
All-NBA First Team: 3 (1999, 2001, 2005)
All-NBA Second Team: 3 (2000, 2002, 2003)
All-NBA Third Team: 1 (2006)
Rookie of the Year: 1 (1997)
All-Rookie First Team: 1 (1997)
Scoring Leader: 4 (1999, 2001, 2002, 2005)
Steal Leader: 3 (2001-2003)
Minutes Leader: 5 (2001-2004, 2006)

... next

 

[Dal-Las Mav'a Riq]

Name a better PG, that still plays

EDIT: Also both Nugs and Mavs don't have a ring yet... so it means nothing

Hey you with the sad face come up to my place and live it up.

You beside the dance floor why do you cry lets live it up

 

[WakeUpPies]

it is stupid to compare the careers of arenas and iverson, any idiot can get the stats from their careers, iverson has been in the system for longer, currently arenas is a better player than iverson

 

[Crow-mo]

Many thought neither could Vlade

Adlman's system is not a run 'n' gun like in Phoenix, his system is more of a half court offence with a lot of player and ball movement and he does like to push it for transition baskets if the opportunity is there.

Vlade was as slow as snail but he played his best basketball under Adelman. Adelman ran a version of Princeton offence which I think he can also do some of it in Houston.

no, that's not the issue. we know Yao can't do it defensively, we know this. Teams like PHX ran him off the court defensively. I can't see why he could suddenly run on the break.

 

[Crow-mo]

AI is the current best point guard still playing.

ha ha thanks

 

[Crow-mo]

Name a better PG, that still plays

um...

I could go with Steve Nash for one

 

[Dal-Las Mav'a Riq]

um...

I could go with Steve Nash for one

Pffft. If you exclude his 3 MVPs, 3 1st team All-NBA selections and 2 trips to the WCFs, what has he actually achieved?????

Nothing.

 

[eathb]

um...

I could go with Steve Nash for one

Steve Nash
HoF Monitor: 273 (20th all-time, 4th among PGs)
Most Valuable Player: 2 (2005, 2006)
All-Star selections: 5 (2002, 2003, 2005-2007, 1 start)
All-NBA First Team: 3 (2005-2007)
All-NBA Third Team: 2 (2002, 2003)
Assists Leader: 3 (2005-2007)
Playoff Experience: Conference Finals 3x, Second Round 3x, First Round
3x (97 games, 17.3 ppg)

The Best PG:
HoF Monitor: 237 (21st all-time, 5th among PGs)
Most Valuable Player: 1 (2001)
All-Star selections: 8 (2000-2007, 7 starts)
All-Star Game MVP: 2 (2001, 2005)
All-NBA First Team: 3 (1999, 2001, 2005)
All-NBA Second Team: 3 (2000, 2002, 2003)
All-NBA Third Team: 1 (2006)
Rookie of the Year: 1 (1997)
All-Rookie First Team: 1 (1997)
Scoring Leader: 4 (1999, 2001, 2002, 2005)
Steal Leader: 3 (2001-2003)
Minutes Leader: 5 (2001-2004, 2006)

 

[Borgsta]

He could be good there. Depends which Francis you get.

My prediction, he'll be good for the 1st half of the season and then he'll play like he has for the past 2 years.

 

[WakeUpPies]

steve nash is currently better than iverson

 

[weapon_of_choice]

Yao is shit.

Everyone knows this. Boring ****ing robot.

ooh look at me and my vast array of attacking moves, i'm a ****ing machine. NO YAO YOU ARE NOT. Trade him for some used rubbers while he still has value.

Steve Francis? hahahaha watch out radioactive man.

Yao? haha. boring.

In other news, Yao lives next door to me and he said he was coming over to play a little play station. all well and good, right? no ****ing way!! that was 3 ****ing hours ago.

how ****ing slow is he?

where the **** is he?

knock knock.

well, it's about ****ing time.

1. Is it possible to program more of these robots that ave 25ppg and nearly 10rpg in a season and cud shoot over any one they wanted to???

2. Is ita also possible to program another robot to insert a brain into your head?

 

[WakeUpPies]

1. Is it possible to program more of these robots that ave 25ppg and nearly 10rpg in a season and cud shoot over any one they wanted to???

2. Is ita also possible to program another robot to insert a brain into your head?

hahah yea only shit players avg 25/9

 

[Dal-Las Mav'a Riq]

If Yao was only posted numbers like 25/9 because he is tall, why isn't Shawn Bradley a Hall of Famer?

 

[Crow-mo]

Steve Nash
HoF Monitor: 273 (20th all-time, 4th among PGs)
Most Valuable Player: 2 (2005, 2006)
All-Star selections: 5 (2002, 2003, 2005-2007, 1 start)
All-NBA First Team: 3 (2005-2007)
All-NBA Third Team: 2 (2002, 2003)
Assists Leader: 3 (2005-2007)
Playoff Experience: Conference Finals 3x, Second Round 3x, First Round
3x (97 games, 17.3 ppg)

The Best PG:
HoF Monitor: 237 (21st all-time, 5th among PGs)
Most Valuable Player: 1 (2001)
All-Star selections: 8 (2000-2007, 7 starts)
All-Star Game MVP: 2 (2001, 2005)
All-NBA First Team: 3 (1999, 2001, 2005)
All-NBA Second Team: 3 (2000, 2002, 2003)
All-NBA Third Team: 1 (2006)
Rookie of the Year: 1 (1997)
All-Rookie First Team: 1 (1997)
Scoring Leader: 4 (1999, 2001, 2002, 2005)
Steal Leader: 3 (2001-2003)
Minutes Leader: 5 (2001-2004, 2006)

you're lack of knowledge is a gift, I grant you. but must you nuture your ignorance with such loving care?

 

[WakeUpPies]

If Yao was only posted numbers like 25/9 because he is tall, why isn't Shawn Bradley a Hall of Famer?

don't let facts get into the yao basher's way

 

[Dal-Las Mav'a Riq]

Steve Nash
HoF Monitor: 273 (20th all-time, 4th among PGs)
Most Valuable Player: 2 (2005, 2006)
All-Star selections: 5 (2002, 2003, 2005-2007, 1 start)
All-NBA First Team: 3 (2005-2007)
All-NBA Third Team: 2 (2002, 2003)
Assists Leader: 3 (2005-2007)
Playoff Experience: Conference Finals 3x, Second Round 3x, First Round
3x (97 games, 17.3 ppg)

The Best PG:
HoF Monitor: 237 (21st all-time, 5th among PGs)
Most Valuable Player: 1 (2001)
All-Star selections: 8 (2000-2007, 7 starts)
All-Star Game MVP: 2 (2001, 2005)
All-NBA First Team: 3 (1999, 2001, 2005)
All-NBA Second Team: 3 (2000, 2002, 2003)
All-NBA Third Team: 1 (2006)
Rookie of the Year: 1 (1997)
All-Rookie First Team: 1 (1997)
Scoring Leader: 4 (1999, 2001, 2002, 2005)
Steal Leader: 3 (2001-2003)
Minutes Leader: 5 (2001-2004, 2006)

Ummm...those stats show that Nash is better.

You have to read things before you cut and paste.

 

[eathb]

you're lack of knowledge is a gift, I grant you. but must you nuture your ignorance with such loving care?

AI > Nash

truth hurt??

AI > Nash in scoring
AI > Nash in defence
AI > Nash in stealing
AI > Nash in achievements
AI > Nash in hairstyle
AI > Nash in who has a hotter wife.

Nash is only better than AI at passing, because he's a pass-first PG.

EDIT: And now that AI is on the Nuggets, watch as his HoF monitor raises

 

[plowking]

AI > Nash

truth hurt??

AI > Nash in scoring
AI > Nash in defence
AI > Nash in stealing
AI > Nash in achievements
AI > Nash in rebounding
AI > Nash in hairstyle
AI > Nash in who has a hotter wife.

Nash is only better than AI at passing, because he's a pass-first PG.

Wrong on scoring and rebounding.
Take a look at the stats. Nash has been the better rebounder spanning last 3 or so seasons. Sure AI is the better scorer, but it's not hard to score when you take the amount of shots he takes. Look at FG% and 3pt% and free throw, Nash wins hands down, meaning if he took the same amount of shots he'd be scoring far more. Achievements is debatable. Nash is currently better mate and I'd rather have him on my team then Iverson.

 

[WakeUpPies]

If you were a NBA player who would you want to be on your team? steve nash or allen iverson? a PG pass first team player or a PG who looks to score before passing?

 

[Dal-Las Mav'a Riq]

Ordinary post.

AI > Nash in scoring

To be more specific, AI > Nash launching 25 jumpers a game at 40% w/o wondering what his teammates are up to. By scoring efficiency, Nash is better

AI > Nash in defence

AI is a matador on defense, Nash aint much better. AI gambles and makes lots of steals, Nash takes lots of charges. A wash.

AI > Nash in stealing

Yep

AI > Nash in achievements

Ummm no. Nash brains him in indivdual and team based acheivements. On what criteria did you base this statement?

AI > Nash in rebounding

The differential would be so negloigible as to be inconsequential.

AI > Nash in hairstyle

Agree

AI > Nash in who has a hotter wife.

No. Read my lips. No.

Here is AI's wife.

Here are some of Steve's concubines.