Hypocracy Continues

[True Thylacine]

Its hardly a shock but I notice in an article in the HUN that TAC have decided not to discontinue their sponorship of Geelong after young Bradley blew the freckle outta the booze bag. I am not shocked at all but just annoyed that Jay Schulz had to go through such public castigation for half the offence. Oh I forgot, the article did point out that Brad was sorry.

 

[wart101]

Its hardly a shock but I notice in an article in the HUN that TAC have decided not to discontinue their sponorship of Geelong after young Bradley blew the freckle outta the booze bag. I am not shocked at all but just annoyed that Jay Schulz had to go through such public castigation for half the offence. Oh I forgot, the article did point out that Brad was sorry.

I disagree.

 

[itsintheblood]

Its hardly a shock but I notice in an article in the HUN that TAC have decided not to discontinue their sponorship of Geelong after young Bradley blew the freckle outta the booze bag. I am not shocked at all but just annoyed that Jay Schulz had to go through such public castigation for half the offence. Oh I forgot, the article did point out that Brad was sorry.

Yeah sorry he got caught.

 

[True Thylacine]

I disagree.

I am not aspousing drink driving in any way nor that thos ethat do shouldnt be punished and punished publically, more that it seems there are rules for some and rules for others where the TAC is concerned

 

[MTBTYT]

It seems the TAC does not take Drink Driving seriously unless you support for Richmond. They should change their slogan to.

"Drink Drive, Support Richmond, Bloody Idiot."

I wonder if the cops have been told to ask what team you support when carrying out a random breath test.

 

[len_jet]

It seems the TAC does not take Drink Driving seriously unless you support for Richmond. They should change their slogan to.

"Drink Drive, Support Richmond, Bloody Idiot."

I wonder if the cops have been told to ask what team you support when carrying out a random breath test.

Isnt this geelongs first case? Where as richmond has had at least two... i think... i think you should be using Collingwood as more of an example. The clokes and morrison for both drinking and speeding... yet they still have their sponsorship... all because buckley and eddie mcusedtobeeverywhere are in ads and put their name to the campaign

 

[tugga]

Personally I think the TAC sponsoring football clubs put them in an awkward position. People make mistakes. Men aged between 18-30 will make stupid mistakes regarding alcohol and driving. Doesn't make it right...but it's going to happen regardless.
Personally, I'm glad we are no longer sponsored by the TAC.

 

[1980]

I wonder if the cops have been told to ask what team you support when carrying out a random breath test.

LMAO@that

 

[The Dice Man]

Personally, I'm glad we are no longer sponsored by the TAC.

Me too, and that's all that matters really.

The TAC ****ing off was a win-win for us

 

[jezza]

Isnt this geelongs first case? Where as richmond has had at least two... i think... i think you should be using Collingwood as more of an example. The clokes and morrison for both drinking and speeding... yet they still have their sponsorship... all because buckley and eddie mcusedtobeeverywhere are in ads and put their name to the campaign

Didn't an official down at Geelong get done a few months ago?

 

[oxx]

Isnt this geelongs first case?

WTF should that be a deciding factor ?

 

[jezza]

http://www.footygoss.com/modules.ph...&POSTNUKESID=709a28d6af3a9de2194aee026e796e7d

 

[len_jet]

WTF should that be a deciding factor ?

well it seemed to be a deciding factor at Richmond.. took at least two strikes before it was revoked...

But i agree the TAC shouldnt be involved at all, sponsor the league maybe but not individual clubs!

 

[oxx]

But i agree the TAC shouldnt be involved at all, sponsor the league maybe but not individual clubs!

Its ridiculous.

Not only do they screw us with rego but they pizz in our faces.

 

[wart101]

I am not aspousing drink driving in any way nor that thos ethat do shouldnt be punished and punished publically, more that it seems there are rules for some and rules for others where the TAC is concerned

i still disagree.