gavaniacono
Cancelled
Im not anyone.Having been someone who assesses applications at different universities I can attest to the fact that some universities.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im not anyone.Having been someone who assesses applications at different universities I can attest to the fact that some universities.
Yes that was the intended meaning, as a joke, an altetnative to the more oft heard and haughty, im not "just" anyone.So you a nobody than?
hire anyone too, apparentlyHaving been someone who assesses applications at different universities I can attest to the fact that some universities take anyone....
or *cough* Martin Hardie *cough*? I see the gang's all back. And the same scenario still prevails.Yup, really do wonder how some of my colleagues got employed.
Under new amendments to the ASADA act the ADRVP step has been removed, which means the AAT step is removed.
This body won't have a separate appeals tribunal like the AFL (rare for a sport to have this) thus be straight to this body than appeal to CAS.
So not sure where you getting the five years from....
Yes, Guzzle is exaggerating - The fact is it took ASADA 16 months to decide players should be charged, and it took 25 months until the AFL's Anti-Doping Tribunal decision was finalised - This is unacceptable under any circumstances.
That's what happens when you have cheats who lie.Yes, Guzzle is exaggerating - The fact is it took ASADA 16 months to decide players should be charged, and it took 25 months until the AFL's Anti-Doping Tribunal decision was finalised - This is unacceptable under any circumstances.
“I do not believe sports should police themselves,’’ said Mr McDevitt, a former Australian Federal Police detective. “Many do not have the capability, and most do not have the motivation.
Anybody who is not a nobody does not post on BF.So you a nobody than?
Oh that statement is doing my head in.Anybody who is not a nobody does not post on BF.
yeah, you're talking about the CAS panel's decision right? Couldn't agree more - more holes than a Swiss cheese!
That said here's a radical suggestion - maybe the tribunal just got it wrong and it was not a conspiracy. Lots of courts and tribunals get it wrong and have decisions appealed.
Yep - forgot about that new evidence. Hugely importantEven more radical maybe the tribunal also got it right based on what was presented...
For example.
ASADA's own expert witnesses not being sure the substance that got molecular tested was TB4...(partly due to molecular testing not being his area of expertise. If ASADA's own expert not sure how could the tribunal be sure?
WADA expert witness, with expertise in molecular testing, was 99% sure.. Ok so CAS could be sure...
But it's all about the optics anyway....