IPA shill resigns

[NSWCROW]

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-...rvice-commissioner-john-lloyd-resigns/9832410

Australia's Public Service Commissioner John Lloyd resigns

GOOD !!!
Now for slimeball fifield

 

[CheapCharlie]

What were his lack of performance issues?
I dont know much about him

 

[Lebbo73]

What were his lack of performance issues?
I dont know much about him

Crow didn’t like him. That’s one!

 

[Mofra]

There was the whole "reducing the size of government" fiasco where public servants were packaged out, then re-hired as consultants on a 40-50% wage increase so the Abbott government could crow about 'reducing public service numbers'.

It cost the government millions of dollars to window-dress for political capital. The IPA idiots lapped it up.

 

[NSWCROW]

Appointed by muckliar

if the SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT wasn't so strong she'd resign tomorrow

 

[Baltimore Jack]

What were his lack of performance issues?
I dont know much about him

He was a lackey for the IPA

 

[HairyO]

He was a lackey for the IPA

Would have been better if a Fabian Society lackey had the job?

 

[Baltimore Jack]

Would have been better if a Fabian Society lackey had the job?

Of course...always

 

[Taylor]

The only differences between bigfooty and a think tank are consensus and money.

 

[Maggie5]

The only differences between bigfooty and a think tank are consensus and money.

What about influencing politicians and policies, don't think BF does that.

 

[Taylor]

What about influencing politicians and policies, don't think BF does that.

If we had consensus and money we could and would.

The old 'divide and conquer' works here, keeps us at each other over minor points of difference (some will argue with me on that as an example).

 

[Maggie5]

If we had consensus and money we could and would.

The old 'divide and conquer' works here, keeps us at each other over minor points of difference (some will argue with me on that as an example).

"IF"...

 

[Taylor]

"IF"...

Hence, the only difference.

 

[AM]

Another IPA ratbag ideologue hits the dust. Good riddance.

 

[Maggie5]

Hence, the only difference.

You didn't notice the capitals?

 

[Taylor]

You didn't notice the capitals?

I guess I'm not understanding your point.

 

[Maggie5]

I guess I'm not understanding your point.

Big IF! You seem to not understand how the IPA works.

 

[Taylor]

Big IF! You seem to not understand how the IPA works.

They are a group of organised people with the means to influence political discussion?

Just like unions.

Just like Bigfooty could be if we were all on the same page and had financial power to make our opinions heard.

 

[Maggie5]

They are a group of organised people with the means to influence political discussion?

Just like unions.

Just like Bigfooty could be if we were all on the same page and had financial power to make our opinions heard.

Okay, whatever.

Try 'a wish list that when Abbot became PM used it as his policy document'.

I am sure it is in the 'Abbott' thread and if I recall correctly implemented at least 20 of their 25 policies.

Can't recall Unions having that much influence but you keep on believing that.

By the way, by pointing out their influence doesn't necessarily mean that I support Union views, but nice try.

 

[Taylor]

Okay, whatever.

Try 'a wish list that when Abbot became PM used it as his policy document'.

I am sure it is in the 'Abbott' thread and if I recall correctly implemented at least 20 of their 25 policies.

Can't recall Unions having that much influence but you keep on believing that.

By the way, by pointing out their influence doesn't necessarily mean that I support Union views, but nice try.

That you think I'm being partisan here speaks far more to you than me, they aren't out to get you Maggie.

Any group of significant size and financial power will exert a political will, even bigfooty could do it if mobilized - which was my only damn point in the entire thread.

 

[Maggie5]

That you think I'm being partisan here speaks far more to you than me, they aren't out to get you Maggie.

Any group of significant size and financial power will exert a political will, even bigfooty could do it if mobilized - which was my only damn point in the entire thread.

Think that your first sentence tells me more about you than me.

 

[Contra Mundum]

They are a group of organised people with the means to influence political discussion?

Just like unions.

Just like Bigfooty could be if we were all on the same page and had financial power to make our opinions heard.

Yeh but everyone knows where unions get their money from. The IPA keep their donors secret


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[HairyO]

If we had consensus and money we could and would.

The old 'divide and conquer' works here, keeps us at each other over minor points of difference (some will argue with me on that as an example).

No they wouldnt.

Yeh but everyone knows where unions get their money from.

Bold statement.

 

[Taylor]

Think that your first sentence tells me more about you than me.

You're the one throwing attitude with your "okay, whatevers".

Yeh but everyone knows where unions get their money from. The IPA keep their donors secret


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Accountability is something democracies could never have enough of.

 

[Maggie5]

You're the one throwing attitude with your "okay, whatevers".
Accountability is something democracies could never have enough of.

Because you can't seem to understand so it is easier to say that. Not attitude, statement of fact.

Accountability is something democracies could never have enough of.

Motherhood statement.