Speculation Jamarra Ugle-Hagan

Remove this Banner Ad

tiger_tough said:

New Victorian rival linked to out-of-contract Dog Ugle-Hagan

“They are a watch for me.”
www.sen.com.au www.sen.com.au

I'd love him but I don't think we're in the position to be giving away another couple of early picks. Plus there would be plenty of other more appealing options for JUH.
Click to expand...
There's no indication we're chasing him, Twomey has just assumed that 1 + 1 = 2, there's a KPF who clubs are chasing + Richmond have a list need of a young KPF = Richmond must be into him.

It's probably not the case at all given what the trade and salary cost would be, we've probably got other targets either in the draft or cheaper trade options or even maybe a FA in the next couple years.

While Lynch is on the park, we can get by, if he plays another 2 years maybe it's a FA we replace him with and not a trade or drafted player.
 
bzparkes said:
Well, you can either discuss it, or leave the thread.

A number of Bulldogs posters throwing endless potshots at the club a poster supporters is straight up pathetic.

It happens in every thread discussing the Bulldogs on the D&T board. It's like some weird defensive mechanism.
Click to expand...

Must have been a different extremely defensive and touchy bzparkes in the Pick 1 2023 trade value what would it take thread?

Just keep the discussion to Jamarra instead of this laughably hypocritical nonsense.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

adogsfan5 said:
You’re not a true supporter if you dont have a genuine connection to your boys. Cmon 747, invest a little more.
Click to expand...

I'm not that invested in a Dogs player trade thread, just passing time. But hypothetically talking trades JUH would cost about the max for a traded player (which these days is probably v high draft pick, FF and good AFL player that the Dogs need).

Of the clubs likely to have the first type of pick, North and Eagles already have a competent KPF and adding an expensive second one is not a good idea if you don't have the mids to supply them. Tigers maybe but they have been burnt in trading recently, Cats don't pay enough and would you trust a FF from us.....etc
 
bzparkes said:
Well, you can either discuss it, or leave the thread.

A number of Bulldogs posters throwing endless potshots at the club a poster supporters is straight up pathetic.

It happens in every thread discussing the Bulldogs on the D&T board. It's like some weird defensive mechanism.
Click to expand...

It’s not just the bulldogs mate, but sure, hissy fit away 😂
 
juss said:
There's no indication we're chasing him, Twomey has just assumed that 1 + 1 = 2, there's a KPF who clubs are chasing + Richmond have a list need of a young KPF = Richmond must be into him.

It's probably not the case at all given what the trade and salary cost would be, we've probably got other targets either in the draft or cheaper trade options or even maybe a FA in the next couple years.

While Lynch is on the park, we can get by, if he plays another 2 years maybe it's a FA we replace him with and not a trade or drafted player.
Click to expand...
Twomey has great mail and relationships with club recruiters. He wouldn't be making it up.
 
tiger_tough said:
Twomey has great mail and relationships with club recruiters. He wouldn't be making it up.
Click to expand...

I believe every club is asking the question and are being told that the current starting point is Sydney's $1.5m a year offer. Dogs trying to leverage sentiment to pay a bit less for less years.
 
The 747 said:
Of the clubs likely to have the first type of pick, North and Eagles already have a competent KPF and adding an expensive second one is not a good idea if you don't have the mids to supply them.
Click to expand...

North desperately need a second quality key forward to pair with Larkey. Certainly not short of mids either. Doesn’t mean they’re interested, but this wouldn’t be the rationale to rule them out.
 
The 747 said:
Well I also discount them because they rubbish at the moment and JUH would have plenty of offers.
Click to expand...
As an aside, with this years' draft full of mids and North drafting heaps of mids in recent years they may well look to trade for needs. They probably need a genuine no 1 KPD more than a no 2 KPF. Comben could be either but he can't stay on the paddock.
 
Mofra said:
As an aside, with this years' draft full of mids and North drafting heaps of mids in recent years they may well look to trade for needs. They probably need a genuine no 1 KPD more than a no 2 KPF. Comben could be either but he can't stay on the paddock.
Click to expand...
Comben looks to be trialed down back, if the practice games are anything to go by.

North should definitely look to trade out their first for an established key forward. Not sure the club would have much appeal to JUH though, especially if, say, Sydney are also sniffing about.

More likely to stay than go, IMO.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

bzparkes said:
Comben looks to be trialed down back, if the practice games are anything to go by.

North should definitely look to trade out their first for an established key forward. Not sure the club would have much appeal to JUH though, especially if, say, Sydney are also sniffing about.

More likely to stay than go, IMO.
Click to expand...
The market for talls is crazy right now. Some suggestion the Hawks offered $900k pa for Marshall!
 
Mofra said:
The market for talls is crazy right now. Some suggestion the Hawks offered $900k pa for Marshall!
Click to expand...
It's definitely overheated. Bulldogs one of the clubs to get lucky with academy/FS picks being talls recently. Probably have the same thing in a few years also, as there's simply so many mids in the first round the past few drafts and this one coming looks the same.
 
Taylor said:
I believe every club is asking the question and are being told that the current starting point is Sydney's $1.5m a year offer. Dogs trying to leverage sentiment to pay a bit less for less years.
Click to expand...

Reports from people inside club are that they’re not worried JuH is even entertaining leaving at all.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
PurpJuice said:
Reports from people inside club are that they’re not worried JuH is even entertaining leaving at all.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Click to expand...

The only thing you can believe out of a non bias party is the wet ink on the paper.

The best example is Dayne Beams at Brisbane's B&F telling the crowd he isn't going anywhere, meanwhile the plan to move him back to Victoria had been in the works since the middle of the season.

At some point, the player needs to put the ink on the paper.
 
Snuffaluphagus said:
For obviously selfish reason, I hope we hear Sydney are offering him a Buddy deal and he takes it
Click to expand...
Reports this morning that Grundy's costing the Swans more than first thought, and their salary cap has "returned to bursting point".
 
Last edited:
juss said:
That's the problem, we have cap room but he ain't a FA
Click to expand...
If our list was in a better position overall I would be happy to pay pretty much anything
But as it stands we really need to hit the draft for some quality
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top