Josh Hunt report

[ablettjnr]

Has anyone seen this incident? Because I sure havent. What do you think will happen to him?

 

[Akalon]

I don't think it was caught on camera (or was it), so he might get off based on lack of evidence.

 

[Unwritten_Law]

If you get pinged by an ump and there's no video evidence, you are fooked.

 

[dodgyhodgy]

So much for if you do anything on Friday night it will be caught on camera, every angle of the ground covered, yeah right.

 

[ablettjnr]

I agree with unwritten_law, he is in trouble. His word against the umps, the ump wins everytime.

 

[LongBomb]

He has just been offered a 2 week holiday.

 

[Unwritten_Law]

The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point), behind play (two points) and body contact (one point). This is a total of seven activation points, which relates to a Level Three offence, drawing 325 demerit points and a three-game suspension. He has no applicable good or bad record. An early plea would reduce the penalty by 25 per cent to 243.75 points and a two-game suspension.

Low impact. 3 weeks. ******** off.

 

[Bartel'sNo1Fan]

Where did you get that from? Or are you just guessing

 

[LongBomb]

Geez we are copping it from all sides at the moment.

 

[Meeker]

I've been trying to find some info on the Josh Hunt report; there's nothing on the main AFL board. Three weeks seems a little harsh for a low contact incident. As ablettjnr and Unwritten_law have said, Josh 'Schapelle' Hunt is a goner. If it's his word against an Idiot's, the Idiot will be believed every time. It's a shame. He's one of the Cats I like watching. The guy's a tank and a superb pack mark.

 

[Hulk_Hawkins]

Have heard today that he has been offered two weeks but they will contest it. How can they judge an incident if no one actually saw it?
Absoloute joke IMO