King Arthur

[bunsen burner]

Anyone seen it? What's it like? What would you compare it to?

 

[M29]

Originally posted by bunsen burner
Anyone seen it? What's it like? What would you compare it to?

It's garbage. I'd compare it to a festering peice of shyte.

 

[Freo Big Fella]

Originally posted by bunsen burner
Anyone seen it? What's it like? What would you compare it to?

Think Pirates of the Carribean without Johnny Depp's interesting charcter. Interesting take on the story though, Kiera Knightly ruined it.

 

[Mog]

They crap on about historical accuracy, yet they don't fight naked like a good Pict would. No big deal for Keira; she has no breasts to expose.

 

[M29]

Originally posted by Mog
They crap on about historical accuracy, yet they don't fight naked like a good Pict would.

Also Merlins a warrior in the film, not a wizzard. And the Romans have Brush hats in the film, the peroid which the film is based, they didn't use them. Duh! The fight scenes, FFS what was going on, whom was fighting whom? I won't even bother about 'The man that united a nation' claim.

Worse than Troy. Remember, any Historical fact in a hollywood movie is purely coincidental. I look forward to them giving Alexander the Great a good old rooting next year or whenever it's meant to be released.

 

[benny's buddy]

Originally posted by M29
Worse than Troy.

Agreed. Troy was much better. If you need to kill a couple of hours one arvo, go see it. Otherwise, I wouldn't bother.

 

[Arks]

Yeah I hated this movie, it was just so plain and boring.

 

[bunsen burner]

Thanks. Heard enough. Will probably give it a miss.

 

[SonOfScray]

The way they marketed as a true story and a film which debunks the myth of King Arthur was enough to put me off.

 

[Eriiin]

It was the same as Braveheart... but Braveheart was better.