- Joined
- Sep 24, 2004
- Posts
- 24,882
- Reaction score
- 5,352
- Location
- The Dom
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- HŠK Zrinjski Mostar
No bites in the draft,obviously clubs don't want to take a punt with his pending court case in W.A.,his career over.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

So much for frawdleys prediction "he's gonna be a little rippa"![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He did play over 100 games......
Very good point. Although I don't agree with much he says, Frawley was right when he said Krak was playing a decade too late. Every time they played in the wet, Krak was sensational. And don't question his work ethic, he was the best tackler at our club from the time he walked thru the door. His forward pressure was better than anyone at the club. Has anyone actually contemplated that he maybe just wasn't as good as we all hoped he would be.
No bites in the draft,obviously clubs don't want to take a punt with his pending court case in W.A.,his career over.
I certainly don't agree that he was a wasted mega-talent. Complete opposite really. A guy with no stamina, a tiny body, and questionable ability who made himself a 100 gamer largely based on tackling and the occasional goal assist.
I'd put him in the category of blokes who made quite a bit out of very little - he's in the Howat, Goodwin, Chaffey camp for mine.
krak had more talent in his thumb than all those guys put together
he never had the pace but if he actually tried to get his body right and build some fitness he would of acheived much more
was treated like a baby as soon as he arrived and no one told him he had to work for it
bang on, beautiful hands, was a very skilful player who could have achieved a lot more but had a shocking fitness base with little will to try and rectify it
bang on, beautiful hands, was a very skilful player who could have achieved a lot more but had a shocking fitness base with little will to try and rectify it
Court case or no court case, main reason for no bites is that he isn't much good !!!!!No bites in the draft,obviously clubs don't want to take a punt with his pending court case in W.A.,his career over.
If I put a highlights reel together of Krak Id have anyone believe he was a superstar
I certainly don't agree that he was a wasted mega-talent. Complete opposite really. A guy with no stamina, a tiny body, and questionable ability who made himself a 100 gamer largely based on tackling and the occasional goal assist.
I'd put him in the category of blokes who made quite a bit out of very little - he's in the Howat, Goodwin, Chaffey camp for mine.
I certainly don't agree that he was a wasted mega-talent. Complete opposite really. A guy with no stamina, a tiny body, and questionable ability who made himself a 100 gamer largely based on tackling and the occasional goal assist.
I'd put him in the category of blokes who made quite a bit out of very little - he's in the Howat, Goodwin, Chaffey camp for mine.
surely any player who doesn't reach their peak because they had no stamina and a tiny body - would have to be a wasted talent. I mean, stamina and body mass is one of the easier things to improve on in professional sport.
i don't think it was a matter of "questionable ability" - as he could play extremely well in spurts - it was more his questionable work rate, stamina and concentration which let him down - all things which can be worked on in training and extra sessions
Surely thats not Simon Goodwin?
No, Andy Goodwin and Johnny Howat. They may be before your time.
Only followed the tigers since 95 thanks to Richo.
Good work in a non-vic state.![]()
Only a matter of time until the croweaters brainwashing wore off 
Krak was a 12 possession, 1 game a goal player and he maintained that level throughout his career (apart from his last season). Because he reached his level fairly early, and because he could do some tantalising things, people thought he was going to take another step but he never did. Not because he was lazy or any other reason, simply because he had already reached his peak. Maybe he would have done a bit more back in the days of the old fashioned full forward that brought the ball down to his feet for crumbers to swoop on. But the days of specialist crumber pockets are just about over, unless you have serious talent like a Nathan Brown or Mark Williams. Unless you have a few other strings to your bow, just being a crumbing pocket is barely enough. Even some of the better ones like Farmer, Milne, Schneider get shopped around from year to year come trade time. Krak did well to forge a 100 game career with the talent he had. I think he had a serviceable career with us (certainly better than many others who played throughout the 90,s and early 00's) but it was time to move on. Thanks and good luck Krak.![]()
Krak was a 12 possession, 1 game a goal player and he maintained that level throughout his career (apart from his last season). Because he reached his level fairly early, and because he could do some tantalising things, people thought he was going to take another step but he never did. Not because he was lazy or any other reason, simply because he had already reached his peak. Maybe he would have done a bit more back in the days of the old fashioned full forward that brought the ball down to his feet for crumbers to swoop on. But the days of specialist crumber pockets are just about over, unless you have serious talent like a Nathan Brown or Mark Williams. Unless you have a few other strings to your bow, just being a crumbing pocket is barely enough. Even some of the better ones like Farmer, Milne, Schneider get shopped around from year to year come trade time. Krak did well to forge a 100 game career with the talent he had. I think he had a serviceable career with us (certainly better than many others who played throughout the 90,s and early 00's) but it was time to move on. Thanks and good luck Krak.![]()