- Joined
- Aug 4, 2005
- Posts
- 22,929
- Reaction score
- 16,129
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Aussie cricket team
This is a pretty general footy topic and could have been posted on the main board I guess but I thought putting it here just allowed for tighter discussion.
I’ve been thinking about how footy has / is changing over the past few years.
Back say 15 years ago if you were sent to the bench it was demeaning. You were being beaten, playing unaccountable, and were punished.
15 years ago if couch, hocking and ablett were given 5 minutes every quarter to ‘have a rest’ there would have been calls of flirting with form, arrogance, lack of respect for the opposition etc.
Now it is just taken for granted and you are actually silly not to do it. Who’d have thought?
And therefore there is significant emphasis on the guys from 16-22 to be able to play at a competitive level to ensure there is no momentum / quality lost during those 5 minutes.
As they say ‘it’s not about how good your top 5 are but how good your bottom 5 are’.
It’s match day list management really.
The next change. Club list management.
Through the quality of Geelong’s list and their on field strength I had actually thought Geelong would have taken it a further step this year. And Prismall is where my thought originated.
Why aren’t players rested from games more often / if at all?
In baseball the main pitchers only play 1 in 5 games. In Cricket the bowlers generally get a rest every series. There’s plenty of others, why not AFL?
I’ll give you a general example. (not looking a fixtures etc)
Week 9 – Ablett out, prismall in
Week 10 – Bartel out, Ablett in
Week 11 – Ling out, Bartel in
Week 12 – Selwood out, Ling in
Week 13 - prismall out, Selwood in
Etc. etc.
Now you could really fold that out with forward line resting and backline resting as well. So there could be 3 changes every week say.
Obviously the immediate benefit is the player gets a rest, but also it could assist in lengthening careers.
But more importantly it gives game time to those young bodies that need it.
Also the players that are getting some game time are becoming more valuable as trade options. The club becomes stronger on the ground, in the VFL, and at the trade table.
So instead of it being about ‘how good your last 5 are’, it becomes ‘how good 17-26 are’
I thought the cats would go this way at the start of the year, but then when we had so many players in the all star game I thought they would definitely do it to give them time off.
But would this be seen as flirting with form, arrogance, lack of respect for the opposition?
Will it become the norm in the future?
I’ve been thinking about how footy has / is changing over the past few years.
Back say 15 years ago if you were sent to the bench it was demeaning. You were being beaten, playing unaccountable, and were punished.
15 years ago if couch, hocking and ablett were given 5 minutes every quarter to ‘have a rest’ there would have been calls of flirting with form, arrogance, lack of respect for the opposition etc.
Now it is just taken for granted and you are actually silly not to do it. Who’d have thought?
And therefore there is significant emphasis on the guys from 16-22 to be able to play at a competitive level to ensure there is no momentum / quality lost during those 5 minutes.
As they say ‘it’s not about how good your top 5 are but how good your bottom 5 are’.
It’s match day list management really.
The next change. Club list management.
Through the quality of Geelong’s list and their on field strength I had actually thought Geelong would have taken it a further step this year. And Prismall is where my thought originated.
Why aren’t players rested from games more often / if at all?
In baseball the main pitchers only play 1 in 5 games. In Cricket the bowlers generally get a rest every series. There’s plenty of others, why not AFL?
I’ll give you a general example. (not looking a fixtures etc)
Week 9 – Ablett out, prismall in
Week 10 – Bartel out, Ablett in
Week 11 – Ling out, Bartel in
Week 12 – Selwood out, Ling in
Week 13 - prismall out, Selwood in
Etc. etc.
Now you could really fold that out with forward line resting and backline resting as well. So there could be 3 changes every week say.
Obviously the immediate benefit is the player gets a rest, but also it could assist in lengthening careers.
But more importantly it gives game time to those young bodies that need it.
Also the players that are getting some game time are becoming more valuable as trade options. The club becomes stronger on the ground, in the VFL, and at the trade table.
So instead of it being about ‘how good your last 5 are’, it becomes ‘how good 17-26 are’
I thought the cats would go this way at the start of the year, but then when we had so many players in the all star game I thought they would definitely do it to give them time off.
But would this be seen as flirting with form, arrogance, lack of respect for the opposition?
Will it become the norm in the future?










