I'm not drawing any conclusions outside of the intoxication. Given that Lovett was given the riot act when picked up for being drunk in public (which was later dropped) you can assume that club suspended him indefinitely to wake him up to get off the piss and nothing more. It's hard line yes, but it's entirely plausible considering the softly softly approach never worked with Lovett.
Outside of that, it's still an ongoing investigation. although I am wondering who all these supposed sources are at the club that journos are speaking of, consiering the club has not released anything since its suspension nor have players commented individually...
The club doesn't own any talking parrots do they?
The 'soruces' are probably complete crap, or 'word of mouth' which usually involves a lot of chinese whispers.
Which changes the 'players are disappointed' to the 'players are unhappy' to the players are revolting, to the players would rather be delisted than play with him, and next thing we know they'll be going to the West Gate rather than putting on a Saints jumper due to Lovett being a Saint.




Thanks btw.
