maybe, doesnt change the fact that they face deregistration for speaking negatively about it. Who knows how many have had to tow the line. Any doctor having concerns should be able to speak freely. We have always been told to trust the professionals, some have stated there concerns. Many doctors have stated there concern for young children to get vaccinated due to the fact that children have mild symptoms if they catch covid. Look whats happening now, 5 yr olds getting jabbed.
thats where the disciplinary action and deregistration comes into it. Eventually everyone has to tow the line.
There's been discussion on this already so feel free to read through it on previous pages. However, this 'infographic' is just ridiculous. The legislation certainly needs to be discussed and fleshed out... But if anyone honestly believes that a Victorian premier would declare a pandemic when there is none and everyone would just say 'oh well... Guess there must be a pandemic' then that's completely irrational.
Well not in WA.
haha wasnt trying to summon you like bloody mary or batman or something, just warning the person that you'd bring the logical smackdown if they kept making wild and exaggerated claims without any meaningful basis or evidence.
But the flu can reach pandemic levels. Do you think it's suitable to give the government power to impose lockdowns for the flu? Because (and caveat for those freaks in here, although I have blocked one of them, who demand the legislation be read in its entirety that I have not read the legislation in its entirety) the understanding is that there is no OBJECTIVE requirements for risk and the Minister can impose restrictions based on a SUBJECTIVE appraisal of risk.
Haha... No problems. Next time use the logic signal, commissioner.haha wasnt trying to summon you like bloody mary or batman or something, just warning the person that you'd bring the logical smackdown if they kept making wild and exaggerated claims without any meaningful basis or evidence.
but back on topic, how about you make it a bloody mary, in keeping with the theme of you appearing on command
Can you provide a source for this?
no, thats why i asked if its true. i am aware that Victoria parliament is bringing in increased powers and legislation but.
if the flu becomes a pandemic, wouldnt it make sense to use pandemic legislation?
lol, yeh I ask a question with no interest in an answer. Sounds logical
No.
do you prefer shaken or stirred?
I mean, a source for that specific picture you posted.
FWIW, its legislation that labor has previously presented to parliament and has been negotiating with opposition parties for a while now. A number of independents and the greens have gone from opposing to supporting it via negotiations.
It is so far from true it isn’t funny. The new laws basically transfer the emergency powers of the CHO to the health minister, and bring them in line with other states. It’s essentially what the liberals have been asking for for months, and now it’s being brought in they have to oppose it because bipartisan support is impossible.
They have to follow best practice. Like every single other profession you can hold.
Stirred... Unless I'm feeling a little loose. You?
