Mandatory Vaccinations And Medical Exemptions
- Thread starter Goosecat
- Start date
- Tagged users None
.... WA has made the vaccine mandatory for approximately 75% of the workforce. What an absolute human rights abuse.
- Banned
- #2,879
failed in the first sentence. impressive.
Couldn't agree more, an absolute human rights abuse... that there is 25% of the workforce unvaccinated
The NT minister's swipe at Ted Cruz was pretty funny.
Not sure about these two parts.
The Liberal governments laws allowing the police to access your information anytime they want happened right under our noses, without any objections.
They can hack your PCs, your phones, your internet history, everything. They are legally allowed to do it without your knowledge, and are legally allowed to cover their tracks so you'll never know. They can force providers to allow them access, and if they disclose it to you they go to jail.
That's worse than anything that I've ever seen, including restrictions during COVID. At least with COVID there was a reason. Getting a ******* vaccine and staying home for a few months whilst a pandemic is cruising around the world is light weight compared to that s**t.
I get that people are angry about personal impact of this, but the suggestion that this is some new push to take over the world is just wrong.
Freedoms were given up long ago.
Upgrayedd
A Vote for Clive is a Vote for Justice
Which human right?
Refer to Victoria's own charter of human rights - available here https://www.humanrights.vic.gov.au/for-individuals/human-rights/ and take a look at:
From ABC's own mouth as well
Do mandatory vaccinations violate human rights? - ABC Religion & Ethics
Earlier this month, the Victorian state government announced that everyone on the authorised worker list will be required to be vaccinated against COVID-19. All authorised workers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement will not be permitted to attend their place of employment, but...
If you need me to point out that bodily autonomy is a human right you are not worth engaging with.
You people are sick.
- Banned
- #2,887
now show me the part where they are being subject to any of that. have the WA government said that everyone must get the vaccine?Refer to Victoria's own charter of human rights - available here https://www.humanrights.vic.gov.au/for-individuals/human-rights/ and take a look at:
View attachment 1264473
From ABC's own mouth as well
Do mandatory vaccinations violate human rights? - ABC Religion & Ethics
Earlier this month, the Victorian state government announced that everyone on the authorised worker list will be required to be vaccinated against COVID-19. All authorised workers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement will not be permitted to attend their place of employment, but...www.abc.net.au
Aren't Victoria and the ACT the only state with a human rights Charter though?Refer to Victoria's own charter of human rights - available here https://www.humanrights.vic.gov.au/for-individuals/human-rights/ and take a look at:
View attachment 1264473
From ABC's own mouth as well
Do mandatory vaccinations violate human rights? - ABC Religion & Ethics
Earlier this month, the Victorian state government announced that everyone on the authorised worker list will be required to be vaccinated against COVID-19. All authorised workers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement will not be permitted to attend their place of employment, but...
I don't even think Australia does, does it?
We've been called out multiple times for our human rights record by the UN, particularly in relation to our treatment of our indigenous people.
Are you surprised we're pricks? And if so, why?
Refer to Victoria's own charter of human rights - available here https://www.humanrights.vic.gov.au/for-individuals/human-rights/ and take a look at:
View attachment 1264473
From ABC's own mouth as well
Do mandatory vaccinations violate human rights? - ABC Religion & Ethics
Earlier this month, the Victorian state government announced that everyone on the authorised worker list will be required to be vaccinated against COVID-19. All authorised workers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement will not be permitted to attend their place of employment, but...
This is a challenging area to discuss because I can certainly see the validity in both sides of the discussion. I am thinking the people disagreeing with your statement are saying that people aren't being forced into taking the vaccine, it's been made a requirement depending on what area they work in. But at the same time I could completely understand that there will be some people that are feeling forced to take a vaccine because of the area they work in. It's a conundrum for sure!
Yes... or you cannot work in almost any industry.
Correct, but there is a global human rights charter that Australia has signed up to which has the same standards.
- Banned
- #2,892
yeah its amusing hearing comments on freedom from a government which allows on average 1 school shooting per week in the name of 'freedom'.
- Banned
- #2,893
but you're not being forced to take it, and there are jobs which dont require being vaccinated. its just that going forward there are a range of jobs which will require you to be vaccinated for health reasons.
Some Idiot
Brownlow Medallist
- Mar 17, 2009
- 10,258
- 8,126
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Refer to Victoria's own charter of human rights - available here https://www.humanrights.vic.gov.au/for-individuals/human-rights/ and take a look at:
From ABC's own mouth as well
Do mandatory vaccinations violate human rights? - ABC Religion & Ethics
Earlier this month, the Victorian state government announced that everyone on the authorised worker list will be required to be vaccinated against COVID-19. All authorised workers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement will not be permitted to attend their place of employment, but...
The question remains, does the threat of losing employment count as force?
Does being presented with a choice between giving up employment or getting the vaccine classify as a forced medical treatment?
It's definitely not on the same level as being tied down and forced to take something or being given a medical treatment which you did not consent to while unconscious.
I personally lean towards it not counting as a forced medical treatment - but I can see a valid argument for both.
My post suggests its a ramping up of the attacks on any opposition to anything which seemed to start with Howards Tampa (even though most of those people ended up here anyway) It probably started before that.
while then it was the asylum seekers, now similar is extended to the entire population. and the arts community, who traditionally are strong asylum supporters seem to have suffered particularly badly.
If a large part of the population don't see this creeping, then its probably already too late.
- Jul 19, 2010
- 25,598
- 63,238
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Yes
Tampa was direct conflict with maritime Law. Not only don't they care, I think they get off on it.
The human right to not have prerequisites for work.
How dare QANTAS discriminate against me and not employ me as a pilot just because I have never flown a plane in my life?!
So wouldn't that take away the customers individual right to choose? And doesn't that then go against your statement before that you believe in every individual's right to choose?
It counts as coercion - i.e not an individual freely given consent.
