Remove this Banner Ad

Match Fixing allegations

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Apr 29, 2007
578
7
Sydney
AFL Club
Sydney
Top seed Davydenko pulls out in third set in Poland
Drift in pre-match odds prompts investigation

Matt Scott
Friday August 3, 2007
The Guardian


Betfair yesterday refused to settle its wagers after the top seed, Nikolay Davydenko, retired following irregular betting patterns on his tennis match at the Poland Open in Sopot. After winning his first set against the Argentinian Martin Vassallo Arguello 6-2, the Russian Davydenko lost the second 6-3 before withdrawing from the match with his opponent leading 2-1 in the third set.
The story of the match, coupled with the apparently unusual betting, prompted Betfair's market-integrity investigators to launch an investigation into the match. Davydenko and Arguello were unavailable for comment last night.

One punter who was following the match yesterday reported that, despite being the tournament favourite and No4 in the current ATP Tour rankings, Davydenko's pre-match odds drifted to 2.3, equivalent to an 11-8 against although he was set to face a player who stands 87th in the tour rankings. "Despite Davydenko winning the first set 6-2, Vassallo, an inferior player, was still favourite to win on the in-play Betfair market," said the punter.
When the match was suspended, Betfair was showing that $7,310,429 (£3,590,595 ) of bets had been placed and accepted on its site; this compared with approximately $3m during another second-round match at the same tournament, involving Steve Darcis and Tommy Robredo.

The online bookmaker is set to inform the ATP tour of its concerns over the match under the terms of its memorandum of understanding with the organisation, which has been in place since 2003.

It said in a statement: "Betfair has suspended settlement of the match-odds market on this afternoon's second-round match of the ATP Orange Prokom Open in Poland between Martin Arguello and Nikolay Davydenko, pending consultation with relevant regulatory authorities. Betfair has had a memorandum of understanding with the ATP since 2003 and will use it to exchange information should it become necessary."

A spokesman for the tour explained that it holds similar information-exchange agreements with other UK and European bookmakers. "The ATP takes issues surrounding gambling extremely seriously," said a spokesman. "We are committed to ensuring our sport remains corruption free and have strict rules in place governing this area.

"It would be inappropriate for us to comment further on any individual match or on the status of any potential investigation until such time as the process has been completed."

Betfair would not disclose how many times it had previously invoked its memorandum with the ATP tour, stating that such instances are never made public in any sport. However, it is now expected to broaden its investigation into other recent matches about which suspicions of impropriety have been raised. "We look at all matches all the time," said a spokesman for Betfair. "We have an integrity and fraud team of more than 40 people."

There will be particular attention paid to the concerns of punters on the Betfair site's tennis forum, one of whom told the Guardian: "It has become increasingly obvious recently that there are a significant number of 'fixed' tennis matches being played. It is obvious to anyone with some experience of the normal Betfair market behaviour and the appropriate odds for a tennis match that certain low-level ATP matches are being fixed, with corresponding irrational market patterns."

Betfair confirmed it would act on any such comments or debate on its forum. "We're all about transparency," added the spokesman. "You can't miss what is said on our forum, which is there for all to see
 
true your right, all bets were void.


but thing is this is not the 1st time davydenko or any other player for that matter has done this.

from memory there was a match last year davydenko v some unknown, in the 2nd round of the Moscow Open. Davydenko was unbackable at $1.01 and won the 1st set and retired. Betfair has a policy where at Least 1 set must be completed, for bets to stand, suprise suprise he retired.


Also if you have followed Wimbledon a few years back, Davy led 2 sets to 1 and retired.

Food for thought. But he isnt the only one doing this thats for sure.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

true your right, all bets were void.


but thing is this is not the 1st time davydenko or any other player for that matter has done this.

from memory there was a match last year davydenko v some unknown, in the 2nd round of the Moscow Open. Davydenko was unbackable at $1.01 and won the 1st set and retired. Betfair has a policy where at Least 1 set must be completed, for bets to stand, suprise suprise he retired.


Also if you have followed Wimbledon a few years back, Davy led 2 sets to 1 and retired.

Food for thought. But he isnt the only one doing this thats for sure.

I still don't get it. If Davydenko had lost then there would be reason to be suspicious.
 
Ok davydenko was 1.20 before the match

after he won the 1st set, he was $4.30

and there were already suspiscions before the game that the match would be a fix.

and Betfair settles out bets, once a match has usually finished at 'least one set'. He retired in the 3rd set
 
Ok davydenko was 1.20 before the match

after he won the 1st set, he was $4.30

and there were already suspiscions before the game that the match would be a fix.

and Betfair settles out bets, once a match has usually finished at 'least one set'. He retired in the 3rd set

Sure it was strange that there was so much interest in Vassallo but it obviously wasnt going to be a fix as Davydenko would have deliberately lost the 1st set and then retired for that to be the case.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Match Fixing allegations

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top