I am yet to be conviced over schulz at CHB, any of the reports posted during pre season would only support my view.
In my mind he should be groomed as the FF....why?
simmonds will have greater impact as a follower...he is a 3 goal FF at best whilst Knobel gets a game simply because he's 6"6 ..I'd hate to be hanging by the short and curlys waiting for him to take a mark in the front half a gallant battler at best....hope your better soon staff.
wouldn;t be too dissapointed in graemes debut , moved well enough to suggest he will fill a gap whilst the youngins get a yr under their belts...Ray Hall can come back as a key defender..
all in all dissapointed we didnt get the bacon however the indicators dont lie and we kicked what would have been our second best score of 2004. Good first up performance that we can build on , theres plenty of upside there with average performances from Richo/Brown and few others
In my mind he should be groomed as the FF....why?
simmonds will have greater impact as a follower...he is a 3 goal FF at best whilst Knobel gets a game simply because he's 6"6 ..I'd hate to be hanging by the short and curlys waiting for him to take a mark in the front half a gallant battler at best....hope your better soon staff.
wouldn;t be too dissapointed in graemes debut , moved well enough to suggest he will fill a gap whilst the youngins get a yr under their belts...Ray Hall can come back as a key defender..
all in all dissapointed we didnt get the bacon however the indicators dont lie and we kicked what would have been our second best score of 2004. Good first up performance that we can build on , theres plenty of upside there with average performances from Richo/Brown and few others



