Remove this Banner Ad

Mike Postle - Poker cheat (huge drama)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ash_1050
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Posts
4,717
Reaction score
9,078
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Melbourne Victory and Arsenal
For those of you who don't follow the poker world there's currently a huge scandal going on at the moment that's well worth an hour or two going down the rabbit hole.

Mike Postle is a player who had done alright playing poker online and had seemingly found his niche playing at a Sacramento poker club called 'Stones', which live streamed games on Twitch to an audience of between 100-300 a night. Over the course of a couple years Mike went from being an above average player to being exceptional, to the point where he was making all kinds of winning decisions that defied all conventional poker logic. He became revered as some sort of poker savant among the Stones players and commentators until it all came crashing down.

The straw that broke the came's back was this hand where commentator Veronica Brill was left speechless at one too many exceptional plays. She went public with her accusation calling Mike a cheat, which is on par with calling someone a kiddy fiddler in poker circles. To say it blew up is an understatement as it is suspected that Postle was using an insider who relayed people's hands to an electronic device during the hand, allowing him to know exactly what other players had and adapt accordingly. Theories range from Postle receiving info via mobile phone to a bone frequency device to a relay device attached to his leg.

Poker player Joey Ingram went through 40 hours of vision and came to the conclusion that the cheating was systematic and had been ongoing for some time. Poker forum TwoPlusTwo now have a thread dedicated to the story that is 229 pages long at the time of writing for a story that's only a week old. Poker player and YouTube minor celebrity Doug Polk has posted several hands here, here, here and here however there are dozens more hands and hand reviews completed by other players. The whole poker world is piling on with their own thoughts, analysis and condemnation.

Since the story broker Postle has given one interview, to respected yet controversial poker identity Mike 'The Mouth' Matusow here in which he comes across as being overly guilty despite protesting that he is '10,000% innocent'. As someone has noted the figure is quite relevant as he is performing about 10,000% better than your typical professional poker player would be expected to perform over that amount of time. The interview was also a minor controversy in itself as Mike Matusow was stoned during the interview.

Shamelessly stolen details off TwoPlusTwo:

Q: Who is Mike Postle? A: Mike Postle is a long time poker pro. He is suspected of having cheated at the video-streamed pokertable at Stones Gambling Hall in Sacramento

Q: How much money has Postle won from other players in these games? A: Approximation is $250k (source https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=1066 )

Q: How statistically deviant is his play? A: Very. Some calculations put it as more unlikely than 1 to the number of atoms in the universe. See bb/100 vs VPIP graph: https://i.gyazo.com/9640d7665da6f5fb...c935334fbb.png (Source unknown)

Q: How do people think he cheated? A: Likely via getting the exact holecards of his opponents relayed to his phone which he keeps very discretely between his legs while playing, and/or to bone conductive headphones hidden under his hat. This would likely require access to the actual live feed from the RFID/tech-room

Q: Who is Justin Kuraitis? A: An employee and TD of Stones Gambling hall. He's responsible for the tech team that runs the livestream. He's for a multitude of reasons suspected to be Mike's possible inside man in the possible cheating scheme

Q: But Postle doesn't always win when he plays A: True. He has had losing sessions on stream where he plays quite normally. They seem to coincide with Justin Kuraitis being out of town.

Q: Is the stream commentated on in real time when the play takes place, or on delay? A: It's commented on delay, as all streams of this kind are. Only the RFID tech room has (read: should have) access to the actual live footage and hands. They then set up the graphics etc, and transmit that footage delayed to the commentary booth and viewers.

Q: Who is Taylor Smith? A: Another tech team employee of Stones Live Casino. Some consider him suspect due to his involvement in correcting holecards for a crazy hand Mike played, among other things. It's still unclear what Mike's actual holecards were in that infamous hand (68o, or 89ss). T.S may be entirely innocent and should be treated as such, just as Postle and Kuraitis should be until found guilty in a court of law

Q: Why is this blowing wide open just now this week? A: A former employee and commentator of the stream, @Angry_Polak, took to twitter. @joeingram1 took her allegations seriously, as opposed to many others she had previously raised her suspicions to, and then the ball started rolling

Further reading:

Longer cliff-notes/Summary: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=1045

Pokernews links: https://www.pokernews.com/news/2019/...ames-35562.htmhttps://www.pokernews.com/news/2019/...tion-35584.htm

Local Fox40 news: https://fox40.com/2019/10/03/poker-w...g-allegations/

ESPN segment: Joeingram (chicagojoey) youtube page with deep-going investigating of Mike's play: https://www.youtube.com/user/joeingram1/videos Doug Polk video:
 
Last edited:
Pokerstars had a similar issue about thirteen years ago, I became suspicious after losing a couple of big hands I should not have. After some digging around I found out it was based out of Nevada and had been recently sold, just prior to the changeover some whizz in there had apparently installed hidden code that allowed players who knew how to access it, to see their opponents hole cards.

I only played on two sites and have all the Pokerstars merchandising still sitting in my cupboard to remind me of what a git I was, so pretty sure it was that site.

It all went quiet and was hushed up.

EDIT: Not Pokerstars, it was Ultimate Bet.
 
Last edited:
I thought that was absolute poker, but I could be wrong

You're right, my apologies. It was Ultimate Bet (Absolute) not Poker Stars. I've got all their merchandising as well.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

There's something on it here but my drama with them was before 2008 and I only found one other person with the same suspicions I had.

Sorry if I'm wading in here with information everybody already knows, this is my first foray in a poker discussion.

In January 2008, Ultimate Bet players reported cheating that was similar to what occurred on Absolute Poker. What are the chances that two online poker sites, owned by the same person, licensed by the same commission, and using the same software become embroiled in a similar cheating scandal?

Ultimate Bet also eventually confirmed the existence of “suspect” accounts with “abnormally high winning statistics” after being alerted to suspicious results for an account under the name “NioNio.” Subsequently, six other suspicious player accounts were identified—with 18 different screen names between them—and found to have used a single fraudulent account to target the site’s highest-limit games.

 
You're right, my apologies. It was Ultimate Bet (Absolute) not Poker Stars. I've got all their merchandising as well.
ahhh ultimate bet. that was a good poker room back in mid 2000's
 
Pokerstars had a similar issue about thirteen years ago, I became suspicious after losing a couple of big hands I should not have. After some digging around I found out it was based out of Nevada and had been recently sold, just prior to the changeover some whizz in there had apparently installed hidden code that allowed players who knew how to access it, to see their opponents hole cards.

There was a few 'superuser' cheating issues for online poker, most notably Russ Hamilton fleecing other players of approximately US$23m (and basically got away with it).

For those who prefer cheating at casinos poker legend Phil Ivey also got done for cheating at baccarat.

For as long as there has been poker and poker players there has been cheating :D
 
when you watch the World Series of Poker events on ESPN, I don't understand how all these players can wear hoodies and sunglasses etc to shield their expressions. that should be considered as cheating too.

As a player myself the hoody is mostly for comfort, a little bit for disguise. Think of it as going to work for 8 hours in a hoody versus going to work in a button up shirt, you're much more relaxed and comfortable in a hoody. Likewise headphones are for comfort to block out the noise of the room and the sunglasses so people can't see what you're looking at, as it's generally other players. All perfectly legal unless they're attached to a RFID reader that's telling you what cards are coming next :D
 
To OP, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Fascinating story.

To those above who play online poker, if you haven't figured out that it is all rigged by now, you probably never will.

I got sucked in there for a while, but it soon seemed suspicious, too many hands seemed like I was set up to fail.

So I decided to look into the company behind it, the ruse soon became obvious.
 
I've watched heaps of hands and it's dodgy as f. He is looking a phone in his lap and raising with bottom pairs ect.
 
Good rabbit hole OP. Been some time since I've been in the poker scene, but briefly looked at this a few days ago when it come through my FB feed then read up more today after opening this thread. This guy is dodgy as ****.

That hand where the graphics were wrong and he supposedly had the nuts and wasn't bluffing 8-high. o_O Or calling all-in pre-flop with 5-4 against two blokes with A-K. You can only do that knowing they have the same card and cancelling out each others equity.

Posters on 2+2 reckon he is running at something like 70BB/100 hands at Stones. Very few - if any - players have gone on an extended heater like this and certainly not players who were middle of the road pros for a decade and a half beforehand. The fact he's only running hot at one venue just adds weight to the claims. He plays an extremely loose and high variant style of poker yet has so little variance? Get out of here.

The only thing I'm surprised is no one sitting next to him noticed what was on his phone, because he is staring at it for such extended periods. Not to mention how does one get such great reads (as he claims to have) on his opponents whilst he is staring at his dick for half the hand.

The chances of him doing this legitimately are somewhere around 1/1,000,000.

The shit thing is that given it is all circumstantial evidence, he might not get brought to heel in front of a judge. There is a civil lawsuit against him and it will be interesting to see how it goes - burden of proof is much lower than in a criminal prosecution.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom