- Joined
- Jul 17, 2001
- Posts
- 10,320
- Reaction score
- 16,050
- Location
- Here, obviously
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AFC
Meh. Sheehan didn't rate us in seasons 1997 and 1998 either - so keep it up Mike.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

CAR v COL · GEE v WB · SYD v GWS · GCS v ESS · HAW v PA · ADE v StK · NM v RIC · WCE v FRE · MEL v BL ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
The above is true if everyone has played each other once.
If a team is in 6th spot after 3 rounds at 2-1 having played Geelong, the Saints and the Bulldogs are they the 6th best team? Who knows, probably not given they have knocked off 2 sides expected to finish high on the ladder.
Another team could sit in 1st at 3-0 having played Richmond, Melbourne and Freo. Does that make them the best team?

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I dont think Sheean put enough research into his comment.
! You surely can't be serious
!another pointless graphic. So Geelong and the Bulldogs aren't in form?
Yes, we did!
And do we dare to dream? Rd 19:twice in 1 season?![]()
I've just seen a leak of Monday night's On The Couch. When the topic came to Adelaide, Sheehan shrugged us off as having beaten poor teams and then noted Mark Ricciuto's return to form with 3 goals against the Dockers. He then asked how far away Nathan Bassett was from returning from injury.
He was also impressed with Romano Negri in ruck, and that little #40 Eddie Hocking with five goals.
and yet there isn't a single person on this thread that knows half as much as sheahan.
and yet there isn't a single person on this thread that knows half as much as sheahan.
