Arts & Humanities Missteries

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[Illinois Nazi]

Aliens.jpg

 

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[DrVanNostrand]

False flag.

 

[Marlowe]

This is some freaky shit.

 

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[nicky]

GG, wasn't it revealed that 'ata' was human?

Yes it was.

 

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[nicky]

because i've just read an article from 2 days ago saying that it is human.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/23/sirius-documentary-dna-re_n_3135628.html

 

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[GOAUS!]

I'll be the adjudicator of what is and what isn't a false flag, ok?

Hey if you say it's not a false flag I'm willing to believe you .

 

[nicky]

What new evidence is there that justifies the original belief that it's human (sorry but i'm not reading your whole op)?

 

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[Poseidon]

Looks a bit like Stephen Milne

 

[NSWCROW]

 

[rayven]

It's going to be a year to fully understand its DNA.

But what if its, indigenous to this planet and we are not? I guess he gets land rights?

Article speaks on our DNA being 10 billion years old, but this planet is barely half that age?

This thing is small, but its not as if its unheard of. history of Pigmy populations all over this rock.

 

[courtjester]

 

[courtjester]

 

[rayven]

 

[Sydney Bloods]

I already briefly told you why....DNA/genetically, the research (OP) shows it is not human. It is something else. Something hybrid. Example, Chimps are like 99% genetically similar to humans. This thing is nowhere near that. If you read OP they'll explain it a lot better.

You said you wanted a very concise explanation....so don't complain with that concise explanation. If you want to get more into the nitty gritty, read the OP.

You realise of course we cannot claim its a hybrid.

You can point out the differences between us and it genetically, but to confirm its a hybrid of another species you need the full DNA sequence of the second being it came from.

And in reading from the actual report:

"This preliminary report demonstrates how currently available biomedical technologies can be readily applied to the analysis of archeologically and anthropologically relevant human specimens with genetic disorders of unknown origin. This report is not a formal conclusion on the nature of the mutations or the underlying cause of the disorder in this human specimen."

Full analysis of the DNA, and attempts to link genetics to morphology, will eventually follow in an appropriately peer-reviewed article in an accredited scientific journal. The results will be independently verified before publication.”

"Sequence analysis definitively rules out the specimen as an example of a New World primate".

Those examining it certainly consider the species to be human, additionally the Source in the OP is a report that refers to the Dr's reports.

Anything outside the direct quotes from the Dr's can be taken with a grain of salt.

Particularly when they are drawing conclusions from a preliminary study and using that to suggest it maybe a hybrid of an unknown species when the report makes no suggestion for that, in fact the conclusion formed are far removed from what the quotes actually state.

Additionally although interesting (and I'll certainly be looking at it later) the idea of human DNA being older then the planet is not in anyway connected to the report and should not be used to further push a clear agenda by this article to suggest this specimen is at least partially of alien origin.

 

[exe ex machina]

.

 

[Sydney Bloods]

But it shouldn't be suggested at all there's nothing to say it is even a possibility.

 

[rayven]

But it shouldn't be suggested at all there's nothing to say it is even a possibility.

Are you christian?



From the article...

To pursue science is to pursue the truth of matters. What is needed from this point going forward is an open mind so that, together, we may discover the truth about many things yet hidden.

 

[exe ex machina]

.