Okay. Justify “medium impact” in this context, use crayon in needed
Use a crayon .......... wow, that was so cutting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay. Justify “medium impact” in this context, use crayon in needed
When is the AFL going to stop pandering to the bogans and just get rid of unnecessary violence.
I don't care whether it was a tap, get rid of it.
Kicking has no place in the game and to allow that to happen even in mild form is just siding with cowards.
James Sicily in that moment was an absolute coward and its time people started calling people for what they are in those moments.
Disgusting and archaic.
Correct, it is the AFL rules and tribunal guidelines that allow this.Well said & spot on !!!
The AFL are allowing players to punch (eg. Hewitt) and now kick .......... may as well bring back king-hits and shirtfronts whilst they are at it.
What the hell was McGrath doing?When is the AFL going to stop pandering to the bogans and just get rid of unnecessary violence.
I don't care whether it was a tap, get rid of it.
Kicking has no place in the game and to allow that to happen even in mild form is just siding with cowards.
James Sicily in that moment was an absolute coward and its time people started calling people for what they are in those moments.
Disgusting and archaic.
What the hell was McGrath doing?
Sicily is just meant to let them do what they want is he? McGrath was the 5th bloke to have a crack and he came from deep - and you are calling Sicily a coward. Laughable
What injury could sicilys possibly have caused, Considering the tribunal chair called the impact “clearly negligible “?Unless you are suggesting that kicking is okay your point is invalid. Noone was kicking him. Players know they are not in any real danger during those scuffles. It's all handbags and jumper grabbing. Sicily wants to start kicking people. That's potential to cause injury and violence
What injury could sicilys possibly have caused, Considering the tribunal chair called the impact “clearly negligible “?
boo ******* hooUnless you are suggesting that kicking is okay your point is invalid. Noone was kicking him. Players know they are not in any real danger during those scuffles. It's all handbags and jumper grabbing. Sicily wants to start kicking people. That's potential to cause injury and violence
Didn’t realise there was an epidemic of violent kicking offenses in the afl. “Negligible”.The act of kicking has the potential to harm. Why do you want to wait until there is a serious injury inflicted before stamping it out. Get ahead of the game. Kicking is unnecessary violence.
Hope you don’t follow soccer - doubt you’d cope with the “violence”The act of kicking has the potential to harm. Why do you want to wait until there is a serious injury inflicted before stamping it out. Get ahead of the game. Kicking is unnecessary violence.
The act of kicking has the potential to harm. Why do you want to wait until there is a serious injury inflicted before stamping it out. Get ahead of the game. Kicking is unnecessary violence.
The irony in that its only the Hawks fans who think it was right that he got off is not lost on me.
Kicking, regardless of how hard or light it was, has no part in our game whatsoever !!
You cannot defend that sort of behaviour, it's disgraceful & plainly wrong.
Not only Hawks fans. I keep watching it and trying to work out why people are having a sook. There was nothing in that at all. No injury, no pain, or risk of either.The irony in that its only the Hawks fans who think it was right that he got off is not lost on me.
Kicking, regardless of how hard or light it was, has no part in our game whatsoever !!
You cannot defend that sort of behaviour, it's disgraceful & plainly wrong.
What does it add to the game? Nothing.Didn’t realise there was an epidemic of violent kicking offenses in the afl. “Negligible”.
Cmon mate. It wasn’t an aggressive kick. Nobody in the stadium even knew it happened. Including the “victim”. Fines about right.
Plenty of punches get let off almost every week because of how mild they are. No fine.
Ditto head high bumps with WAAAAAAAAY more likely hood of injury.
Hope you don’t follow soccer - doubt you’d cope with the “violence”
So does running down the street come off it it wouldn’t have hurt a fly. McGrath was laughing at it basically. Can we stop suspending everyone for minor things, that’s what the fine system is for. If the AFL want fans paying thousands for tickets and what not why do we want half the competition off the field?
What potential injury and violence could have resulted from Sicily's kick?Unless you are suggesting that kicking is okay your point is invalid. Noone was kicking him. Players know they are not in any real danger during those scuffles. It's all handbags and jumper grabbing. Sicily wants to start kicking people. That's potential to cause injury and violence
It clearly isn’t. Hence the fine.It has no place in the game and juniors shouldn't be seeing it as acceptable.
What potential injury and violence could have resulted from Sicily's kick?
If the AFL are going to use that clause they should have to state what the potential injury is rather than leave it as a grey area. Neale and Hewitt's punches last week had much more potential to cause injury than that kick yet they were graded low impact
It clearly isn’t. Hence the fine.
When is the AFL going to stop pandering to the bogans and just get rid of unnecessary violence.
I don't care whether it was a tap, get rid of it.
Kicking has no place in the game and to allow that to happen even in mild form is just siding with cowards.
James Sicily in that moment was an absolute coward and its time people started calling people for what they are in those moments.
Disgusting and archaic.
Not sure you'd use that same comparison if you had your time again. Only too easy for me to differentiate your example from the one in question but I assume you are exaggerating for effect. Again, see above, let's stop things before they become big things. I agree minor things could be handled by a fine if it was a football act. This wasn't. It has no place in the game and juniors shouldn't be seeing it as acceptable.
I'm not sure why you think making kicking a suspendable offence would rub out that many players, it's pretty rare, but it's important.
It was a minor thing it was dealt with via the fine system, honestly if it was given a fine on Monday everyone would have been fine with it. Pass on suspending him for a kick that wouldn't have hurt a fly, even McGrath said it on multiple occasions.