gingerthedog
Rookie
Do u guys think we will still have a go at trying to get nathan brown or do u think we will concentrate on soloman and stevens or maybe a ruckman?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The Sunday 11th phase of BigFooty's maintenance and upgrade has been completed. Reactions are limited for now. Search is rebuilding. Scheduled Posts are back! Other upgraded features may look/operate slightly different. The styling and colours will change over time.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Originally posted by NICK THE PIE MAN
Been saying it for ever, we should go harder for Brown than Stevens!
Just looking at our forward line for the GF when we started. Tarrant at FF. And Kinnear, Cloke and Walker supporting him in there. It didn't fill me with confidence. You can't win a flag with a forward structure like that.
Nathan Brown is a matchwinner. It is what we lack. Apart from Taz kicking 50 goals, Brown would add another 50-60 goals from the forward pocket. A valuable commodity.
A forward structure of Chris Tarrant, Anthony Rocca and Nathan Brown would be dynamite.
Originally posted by sebastien
Yea I'd rather have Brown, but we certainly cannot match Richmond's crazy offer. The Age also says that Solomon wants to play for Richmond as well
Originally posted by azza102
FF: Brown, Tarrant, Didak
HF: Burns, Rocca, Williams
thats just off the top of my head. Looks pretty good!!
Originally posted by guess_who
CAM Cloke? seriously mate have you even seen him play ZEKE?
Originally posted by Lonie_from_50
I think that shut up the TASMANIAN, Cameron Cloke is a pretty fairy who is the smallest ruckman in the game.
Originally posted by Zeke
FF: Brown, Davidson, Didak
HF: C. Cloke, Rocca, Tarrant
Originally posted by carringbush
Iread the age and thats not what it says