Remove this Banner Ad

On the outer. How would Harry McKay and Darcy Parish trade value compare

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Parish value is a mid to late second. The fact that Essendon has him on a crazy contract is irrelevant other than how hard it’ll be to actually manage a move without Essendon paying a lot of $$$.
 
Parish 25-40, McKay 10-18.

I think Harry McKay is one of the most under appreciated tall forwards in the game, It seems I'm in the minority.
 
I think Sydney rise up the ladder, end up with say pick 12 and then just do pick 12 for Harry McKay
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Didn’t read the thread but to me Parish is at best neutral value on his deal and McKay is positive value so a fair bit would be a have to be added by Essendon for the swap to work
 
Parish would be a cheap trade due to his contract status and having injuries as well as looking like on the outer and the bombers happy to move on from him.

McKay also having issue's but as a coleman medalist and a KPF would have interest from multiple clubs and probably still a pick around #8-#12 in this draft if he moved
 
Parish is a dime a dozen one way running, accumulating, small midfielder. The game is moving past blokes like that. KPFs who are 204cm that have had years of development are infinitely more valuable.
 
Last edited:
Parish injured again after whopping 3 games where he went at 28% by foot surely he has gone up even more in value right bombers fans?
 
Parish injured again after whopping 3 games where he went at 28% by foot surely he has gone up even more in value right bombers fans?

I mean - old man yelling at cloud?

Literally every essendon fan in here has said parish isn’t worth much.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Parish would be worth not much. He could be offered along with 3 or 4 firsts for Harley reid. Hed actually be a good role model in a weak side with hes workrate. No side in the window or is on the cusp of a premiership window is getting Darcy though.

Harry would be an early 20s. Hed be for Carlton to hang onto and trade curnow. Harry provides a better bail out option down the line and brings the ball to ground far more then curnow.

If im the blues im asking for mckertcher and Curtis for curnow at the end of the year
 
Parish would be worth not much. He could be offered along with 3 or 4 firsts for Harley reid. Hed actually be a good role model in a weak side with hes workrate. No side in the window or is on the cusp of a premiership window is getting Darcy though.

Harry would be an early 20s. Hed be for Carlton to hang onto and trade curnow. Harry provides a better bail out option down the line and brings the ball to ground far more then curnow.

If im the blues im asking for mckertcher and Curtis for curnow at the end of the year
Tom Cruise What GIF
 
Parish isn’t a bad player but the problem with a guy like parish is he’s an in and under player where you gotta get pace, tall and skillful mids around. I remember the hawks had the same issue with Tom Mitchell. I think since 21 dons have gotten Durham, Caldwell for that role and it’s just made Parish and even Hobbs and Tsatas redundant. I mean I don’t see how Dons can have Setterfield, Durham, Caldwell, Hobbs, Perkins and Parish in the same team, if anything maybe 3 tops. But he’s worth a pick 30s-40s but his list complete value.

McKay has too but considering his position and he was good last year, a single pick between 10-18 is a steal, Brissy should be all over this but I think there locked in with Allen if not Suns could be a good fit.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top