There has been much discussion lately on the main board as to Pavlich's best position.
The coach seems to think that in the midfield is where he best serves the side.
And I can see where he is coming from because the thought of Haselby and Bell in the middle dishing it out to Pavlich or Headland who then kick it from 50-60 out is the stuff that dreams are made of.
His other option of course is down back where he won all australian honours.He is able to play on any player in the competition and usually totally blanket them while being attacking. Hes proven himself down back but is he wasted?
And of course up forward as the cream of an already imposing foward line. Able to pull down strong marks and kick long he is also the ideal half foward.
Of course some people are going to say play him everywhere and rotate him when needed, but if one position was required what do you think it would be?
My opinion is leave him down back, our midfield though not overly strong can stand on its own with the addition of Headland. He has proven himself down back, offers great leadership and secures up our backline. Along with McPharlin and Parker they make an extremely imposing trio, the likes of Grover give excellent support.
Where almost a perfectly rounded side and puting him in the middle I think will upset this balance.
The coach seems to think that in the midfield is where he best serves the side.
And I can see where he is coming from because the thought of Haselby and Bell in the middle dishing it out to Pavlich or Headland who then kick it from 50-60 out is the stuff that dreams are made of.
His other option of course is down back where he won all australian honours.He is able to play on any player in the competition and usually totally blanket them while being attacking. Hes proven himself down back but is he wasted?
And of course up forward as the cream of an already imposing foward line. Able to pull down strong marks and kick long he is also the ideal half foward.
Of course some people are going to say play him everywhere and rotate him when needed, but if one position was required what do you think it would be?
My opinion is leave him down back, our midfield though not overly strong can stand on its own with the addition of Headland. He has proven himself down back, offers great leadership and secures up our backline. Along with McPharlin and Parker they make an extremely imposing trio, the likes of Grover give excellent support.
Where almost a perfectly rounded side and puting him in the middle I think will upset this balance.




