Religion Pell Guilty!

[Slartibartfast]

Yeah I’ll look elsewhere than David Marr for analysis on the legal system particularly as it pertains to the Catholic Church.

You come here to discuss the issue and as soon as an another opinion is offered you put your head into a bucket of sand.
No comment about what you dont like about the opinion but just I dont like that author so you believe it does not count then.
Truly deluded.

 

[AM]

Tick! Not that anyone should take anything Kelly writes seriously. About as reliable as Blot, Bovine and Kenny.

And let's not forget the Dirty Digger was given a papal knighthood.

Catholic anger at Murdoch's papal knighthood

The Roman Catholic church is receiving complaints from worshippers following news that Rupert Murdoch has been awarded a papal knighthood from Pope John Paul II.

www.independent.co.uk

 

[AM]

You come here to discuss the issue and as soon as an another opinion is offered you put your head into a bucket of sand.
No comment about what you dont like about the opinion but just I dont like that author so you believe it does not count then.
Truly deluded.

C'mon. Bruce knows what actually occurred. So stop doubting him. He has divine powers.

 

[Bomberboyokay]

You have no idea who I am or what I do.

I think you get income from the Catholic Church

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

You come here to discuss the issue and as soon as an another opinion is offered you put your head into a bucket of sand.
No comment about what you dont like about the opinion but just I dont like that author so you believe it does not count then.
Truly deluded.

Like you with Bolt I guess?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

I think you get income from the Catholic Church

 

[Number37]

Actually it is supposed to be. That is the point.

Is it?
Really?

Pray do tell how you determine each person's reasonable doubt to make sure everybodys is the same.

 

[Number37]

What is BS? If you’re talking about Bruce’s claims that the Sacristy is the complete opposite of a ghost town, you are mistaken. I’m not going to say that Pell is innocent because too much mud has been thrown at him over the last several years. Eventually it sticks. However, if the courts have dismissed the busy sacristy defence, as it appears, they have treaded into dangerous grounds. Our judicial system was designed to protect the innocent from wrongful imprisonment. Not to convict people based on opinions or public sentiment.

One missing piece of circumstantial evidence does not constitute reasonable doubt.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Is it?
Really?

Pray do tell how you determine each person's reasonable doubt to make sure everybodys is the same.

It’s in the expression “beyond reasonable doubt”.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

One missing piece of circumstantial evidence does not constitute reasonable doubt.

It wasn’t circumstantial evidence. It was direct evidence. It was his first two Sunday Mass’s. In Advent. They followed the protocol and they gave evidence directly that they remembered doing so. It wasn’t rebutted.

 

[Craven Morehead]

It’s in the expression “beyond reasonable doubt”.

I dearly hope you lose countless nights sleep pondering that phrase.
Meanwhile, those of us who have a justifiable trust in the judicial system will sleep soundly.

Rarely on the internet do you see people such as yourself.
Hence the wide call that you are being paid, or benefitting in some way, by the Catholic Church becomes more plausible with every ridicicous post you make.

 

[Number37]

It’s in the expression “beyond reasonable doubt”.

Every time someone asks you a question you respond with 'one time at band camp Pell couldn't have done it'.

 

[ShanDog]

Thread locked until I can be bothered going back through a number of pages and dealing with the BS.

May or may not happen before Pell gets out of prison.