Prismal

[patdman]

Didnt see him get picked up anywhere...is that right?

 

[Conan Troutman]

Yeah he wasn't picked up by anyone. Hopefully we can get him next year. Not sure if he's eligible for the rookie draft??

 

[scottydeewah]

yeah Rookie would be cool, i thought there was an age requirement though so i dont think he is eligable.

 

[My5t3r10u5]

This is the one mistake I think Geelong made in the draft. Should have delisted Gardiner (he's almost certain to go next year anyway) or another fringe player for a late pick and picked up Prismall with a late pick. Now we will have to use a much earlier pick next year (assuming all the talk is correct) if we want to get him.

 

[cats2rise]

What is so good about Primsal? If he did not gt picked up by anyone, is that not an indication to you all?

 

[ben_cats_fan]

What is so good about Primsal? If he did not gt picked up by anyone, is that not an indication to you all?

One name... Pavlich

 

[spanna050]

What is so good about Primsal? If he did not gt picked up by anyone, is that not an indication to you all?

You obviously haven't seen him play. Averaged over 2 goals a game and kicked four to win the game for the Jets against the Ranges.

He is bottom age and eligible for the draft next year which is the more likely reason why he didn't get picked up.

We may rue not picking him up this year.

 

[Stoney]

Reasons why Prismall didnt get picked up .....

1) AFL scouts didn't think he was good enough - as they are the experts and see more games than you or me, I'd believe their call over a bunch of bigfooty posters.

2) A little incident that was big news about a month ago - thats all im saying, i remember a rumour flaoting around that had no substance whatsoever - but perhaps there was an element of truth to this rumour. I mean if Prismall is that good - it seems strange as to why he was completely overlooked.

 

[cats2rise]

Regarding your second point. Oh, i see BUT that would not have any implication with his footy career one would think.

 

[Stoney]

it was raised on the main board that clubs may be reluctant to take someone involved due to moral / ethical reasons.


to everyone who is going to accuse me of labelling prismall as being involved please don't - i am merely raising a suggestion as to why he wasn't picked if he really is as good as everyone says he is ...

 

[GeeCat]

Not sure if he's eligible for the rookie draft??

Prismall will have to wait till next year. As a bottom-ager he's ineligible for the rookie draft.

 

[Moon Man]

As a good friend of Prismalls
i can assure you he had nothing to do with the "DVD" incident.

 

[someday-somehow]

Reasons why Prismall didnt get picked up .....

1) AFL scouts didn't think he was good enough - as they are the experts and see more games than you or me, I'd believe their call over a bunch of bigfooty posters.

quote]

Ouch! I'm not sure if you realise but most Talent scouts trawl through BigFooty looking for idea's on who to draft.

 

[Rosella]

As a good friend of Prismalls
i can assure you he had nothing to do with the "DVD" incident.

There was enough info given to work out who it was - it was not Prismall.

 

[SriLankanCat]

im glad that he wasnt involved in taht DVD incident...i find it hard to believe that a human being could be involved in such an incident

I hope the catters pick him up in the rookie draft of he is eligible

 

[burto]

im glad that he wasnt involved in taht DVD incident...i find it hard to believe that a human being could be involved in such an incident

I hope the catters pick him up in the rookie draft of he is eligible

Unfortunately there's a lot of ****************s out there mate.