The boys in South Africa like they did last year ranked the team on who they thought was the best or most important to the side from 1-35 (as the new players weren't included). Since these results would never be released (as it shouldn't be) i thought would it be too harsh if we did our own?? and if it is why not a 1-30 or 1-25 so those players that are at the bottom are too unfairly dealt with and named



