Riewoldt or ROK?

[CaptainChardonnay]

Ok, Two trades, and I have the cash to get either. Trouble is, which one?

ROK is higher price - $670k and probably as expensive as he's going to get. Riewoldt has bottomed out at $560k. But seriously, money is not the issue.

ROK probably scores higher more frequently, but Roo is ultra reliable.

Saints are in the finals and will play everyone through the year (?), Maybe a rest is coming for Roo? Sydney haven't been out of the finals under Roos and will they be tempted to wrap ROK up for the year?

Worst case scenario here is getting either one and them getting an LTI or a holiday in R22.

Thoughts?

 

[Bloods]

I've got both so I'm pretty happy. I'd probably go O'Keefe - tends to play his best footy against good opposition and we've got some tough games coming up - St.Kilda, Geelong, Collingwood and Brisbane.

 

[adam1302]

got both as well but would have to say Riewoldt seeing he is more reliable and Saints will be in the finals , but it is a hard one can't really go wrong either way.

 

[Judd_Magic]

I have both too and have been mighty happy that I do. Roo has been so consistant and ROK's last 7 weeks or so have been awesome.

 

[Rimmer]

The answer is yes.

They are the second and third best forwards available. Only Chappy is above them.

Riewoldt is likely to be the more consistent ... 95 - 125 range ... RoK is the most likely to explode for you ... 70 - 150 range.

Either way you win.

 

[Faz 2000]

Neither is wrong. Is both an option?

ROK's been powering my team since he cost $470k. Best trade of year.

Far more teams have Riewoldt - do you want to match-up against other teams (conservative), or do you want to differentiate yourself (ROK)?