- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Posts
- 5,009
- Reaction score
- 455
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Okay!Dumb post.
Err, that's exactly how play on at all costs football works out sometimes. Just turning around, wheeling wide of the mark and hoping for the best. Tonight it didn't come off. We wheeled around, or handballed to the runner, only for the runner to look up and see nothing.If you class yourself as a genuine football follower you'd have to accept that the ball movement of Carlton was dreadful. There was no direction and the fact that you initially claimed that your mob was playing "play on at all costs football" is laughable.
I'm not sure why it's so hard for you to understand.
We were then under pressure and decided to chip sideways or backwards - rather than taking the time picking an option, working it up the wing a la Collingwood last night.
There were several reasons - not one. Our kicking was woeful from the outset, which lead to a drop in confidence, and resulting in less frequent leads, or leads without conviction, leading in turn to less space in and around the F50, meaning less optionsThe reason for the dreadful ball movement was a lack of any options across Half forward, and when you did get there it was a kick in hope to the top of the goalsquare.
If you class yourself as a genuine football follower you'd have to accept that several factors lead to this lack of options... Wow, that was really quite witty of me.
That's exactly what my previous posts have been saying. But why specifically quote parts of my post you haven't been able to understand?Sydney on the other hand moved the ball by hand very well through the middle and created their own space via the flood.


