benrick
Debutant
I posted this on the main board, interested in cats fans response as well.
... with no idea about anything remotely close to football. I hate Walls because he always makes the obvious comments that anyone could make, and also (more importantly) refuses to rate cats, and hasnt for past 10 years. He wrote a big article in saturdays paper about geelong, the last paragraph being
"Should Geelong beat the Bombers tonight, it will be time to sit up and take notice. If the Cats don't, defeat will confirm what most people think. And that is that they are still just a middle-of-the-road side."
First of all, thats pretty harsh given that essendon are supposedly a top 4 side and we played them at their home ground. Anyway, after we beat essendon, on the couch he says he still doesnt rate us, because they didnt have hird and hird is worth 4 goals. He knew they wouldnt have hird when he wrote his stupid article on Saturday.
Moving on, he said he will only rate us if we beat saints, brisbane in brisbane, or melb at the g. Besides beating melb at the g, other 2 scenarios have been imposssible so far this season. No one has beaten saints since we have (rd 22 '03), also came very close to winning in wiz cup, we also have already beaten melb. He rates essendon as top4, and we beat them on their home soil.
Now, i'm still not convinced about us yet this year, we could be overperforming so far, its too early to tell. All i wanna say is how can anyone respect what he says, when he is just a ****head who goes back on what he originally says.
Does anyone respect him or what he has to say?
... with no idea about anything remotely close to football. I hate Walls because he always makes the obvious comments that anyone could make, and also (more importantly) refuses to rate cats, and hasnt for past 10 years. He wrote a big article in saturdays paper about geelong, the last paragraph being
"Should Geelong beat the Bombers tonight, it will be time to sit up and take notice. If the Cats don't, defeat will confirm what most people think. And that is that they are still just a middle-of-the-road side."
First of all, thats pretty harsh given that essendon are supposedly a top 4 side and we played them at their home ground. Anyway, after we beat essendon, on the couch he says he still doesnt rate us, because they didnt have hird and hird is worth 4 goals. He knew they wouldnt have hird when he wrote his stupid article on Saturday.
Moving on, he said he will only rate us if we beat saints, brisbane in brisbane, or melb at the g. Besides beating melb at the g, other 2 scenarios have been imposssible so far this season. No one has beaten saints since we have (rd 22 '03), also came very close to winning in wiz cup, we also have already beaten melb. He rates essendon as top4, and we beat them on their home soil.
Now, i'm still not convinced about us yet this year, we could be overperforming so far, its too early to tell. All i wanna say is how can anyone respect what he says, when he is just a ****head who goes back on what he originally says.
Does anyone respect him or what he has to say?




