Media ROBMEDIA WHO'S LEADING WHO?

[Chipmunk]

It’s better to write:

‘Part of a 9 person Leadership team specialising in online sales, which recently finished in the top 2 in the country.’

On your CV.

 

[Jabba73]

I only said yes because when you once asked if I wanted the LG, I thought you were referring to a microwave.

Wait until you work out what the committee gig is you agreed to ...

 

[Bovo]

Wait until you work out what the committee gig is you agreed to ...

Committee? I don’t wear a suit anymore. In fact most days I walk around in my underwear. Are you sure about this?

 

[Jabba73]

Committee? I don’t wear a suit anymore. In fact most days I walk around in my underwear. Are you sure about this?

Underwear would be an improvement on the naked ambition usually on display.

 

[Bovo]

Underwear would be an improvement on the naked ambition usually on display.

I was inspired by movies such as Free Willy. No one likes Willy all locked up!

 

[Braklet]

I was inspired by movies such as Free Willy. No one likes Willy all locked up!

And now kids, let's hear the story about why Unca Bovo has to stay 200m away from any school!

 

[thewizardmelon]

And now kids, let's hear the story about why Unca Bovo has to stay 200m away from any school!

Ooh ooh I’ve heard about this film!

Ban Bastard Bono - the documentary!

 

[Chat Pile]

Clearly 4 is the ideal number.

 

[Tandy]

Clearly 4 is the ideal number.

C - Chat Pile
VC - Chat Pile
DVC - Chat Pile
LG - Chat Pile

 

[Chat Pile]

C - Chat Pile
VC - Chat Pile
DVC - Chat Pile
LG - Chat Pile

Club would fold in a few days.

 

[BRAB]

View attachment 1895061
We are currently playing the Bears and the subject about the of the size of leadership groups came up once or twice. I've had a look and this is how it's looking at the minute

Bears 9
Bombers 8
Royals 8
Warriors 8
OOB'S 7
Hawks 6
Wonders 5
Dragons 5
Demons 5
Furies 5
Swamprats 5
Roys 4
Gumbies 4

A quick look there and I've picked up that the Bears have thrown half their team into the leadership group with a number of clubs not far behind on 8, then there are five clubs with 5 members each, and at the bottom of the table sits the Roys and Gumbies with 4 in their leadership group.

What do we think is the right formula here, is 9 too many or is 4 not enough, i personally think 7 is the perfect number myself, just enough to spread the load around. What do the members of Sweet think?

Wow just realised that Ligma still isn’t in the leadership group at the dragons.

Heartbreaking to see.

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

A lot of teams abuse the leadership group incentive purely to appease their players that post high numbers. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it's interesting how the majority of the league include people into their LGs based on quantity.

Sure you can say it has to do with activity and being on bigfooty regularly to check the LG chatter, but I feel like the LG should contain only individuals that are 'leaders' of the club.

In my mind that should be:

• at least one veteran who has been with the club for 100+ games and knows the team inside and out
• the captain of course
• the VC who is either the person who just stepped down as captain or someone who the club feels is capable of stepping into the captain role in the not too distant future
• a relatively fresh face that has a new outlook and different thoughts surrounding the league and the team (typically its a 2nd or 3rd season poster that has recently joined the league and can provide different views)

So around 4 or 5 people should be enough. More than 6 or 7 and I think it's going to start feeling like people will have to talk over and the PM will become cluttered with a lot of regular chatter.

Wow, a serious post......you should run for admin!!

 

[DenieD]

Wow, a serious post......you should run for admin!!

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

 

[thewizardmelon]

View attachment 1895061
We are currently playing the Bears and the subject about the of the size of leadership groups came up once or twice. I've had a look and this is how it's looking at the minute

Bears 9
Bombers 8
Royals 8
Warriors 8
OOB'S 7
Hawks 6
Wonders 5
Dragons 5
Demons 5
Furies 5
Swamprats 5
Roys 4
Gumbies 4

A quick look there and I've picked up that the Bears have thrown half their team into the leadership group with a number of clubs not far behind on 8, then there are five clubs with 5 members each, and at the bottom of the table sits the Roys and Gumbies with 4 in their leadership group.

What do we think is the right formula here, is 9 too many or is 4 not enough, i personally think 7 is the perfect number myself, just enough to spread the load around. What do the members of Sweet think?

Rob, I can confirm a 9 person brains trust was not the right way in Round 1, but a 7 person one was.

 

[Chipmunk]

Rob, I can confirm a 9 person brains trust was not the right way in Round 1, but a 7 person one was.

I did tell the team I counted as -1, so it was even at the bounce!

 

[Robertio]

Rob, I can confirm a 9 person brains trust was not the right way in Round 1, but a 7 person one was.

We found some great rookies as well mate.

 

[thewizardmelon]

I did tell the team I counted as -1, so it was even at the bounce!

Well then, that changes things. Uh, insert other reason here

 

[Chipmunk]

Well then, that changes things. Uh, insert other reason here

Happy to have missed all of that

 

[thewizardmelon]

Happy to have missed all of that

No doubt back in the W column next week!

 

[Chipmunk]

No doubt back in the W column next week!

I would say av bet on the return game, but looks like we’re not playing again til the Grand Final? Maybe next season.

 

[thewizardmelon]

I would say av bet on the return game, but looks like we’re not playing again til the Grand Final? Maybe next season.

Whatever odds there are for an LVB v OOB granny, put your house on it!

 

[Robertio]

Whatever odds there are for an LVB v OOB granny, put your house on it!

Looking good, it's Monday and we still have 4 points.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Yet another indicator that the Demons trail the Hawks on.

Sad times.