- Thread starter
- #26
100% agree Danno (how many times has anyone said that to you mate?)
Dees have been very dangerous all year. 9 times outta ten we'd win by around 3-4 goals (no more). 1 outta ten - look out.
That said, even if we lost first up I cannot see anyone beating us subsequently - particularly Carlton - Melbourne would be very unlikely to do it twice and North just don't seem to have had much luck getting it all together this year (what with suspensions to Archer, Martyn - Stevens incident - Colbert Hammies - picking up Calthorpe). (1929 all over again)
Dutch
PS. Nice, is it not, to see Neale Daniher have the sort of success off the field that he was so cruelly denied on? (should have been a double-flag captain failing those fateful knees)
Dees have been very dangerous all year. 9 times outta ten we'd win by around 3-4 goals (no more). 1 outta ten - look out.
That said, even if we lost first up I cannot see anyone beating us subsequently - particularly Carlton - Melbourne would be very unlikely to do it twice and North just don't seem to have had much luck getting it all together this year (what with suspensions to Archer, Martyn - Stevens incident - Colbert Hammies - picking up Calthorpe). (1929 all over again)
Dutch
PS. Nice, is it not, to see Neale Daniher have the sort of success off the field that he was so cruelly denied on? (should have been a double-flag captain failing those fateful knees)