POTY Round 6 v Melbourne Demons

[grimlock]

5 Hannebery
4 Parker
3 Jack
2 Kennedy
1 Malceski

YPOTY Cunningham

(Mod edit: Eligible for YPOTY Cunningham, Lloyd)

 

[Superstar swan]

5.hannebery
4.jack
3.malceski
2.kennedy
1.parker

Ypoty:Lloyd. ( wasn't too impressed with Cunningham last 2 weeks)

 

[Heeney2Franklin]

5. Hannebery
4. Kennedy
3. Parker
2. Jack
1. Malceski

YPOTY Cunningham

 

[AlibiMonday]

5. Hannebery
4. Jack
3. Parker
2. Kennedy
1. Malceski

YP Cunningham

 

[S120]

5. Dan Hannebery
4. Luke Parker
3. Kieren Jack
2. Josh Kennedy
1. Craig Bird

YPOTY: Harry Cunningham

 

[AlibiMonday]

BTW - Who's managing the total counts and leaderboard this year?

 

[RW]

5. Hannebery
4. Jack
3. Bird
2. Parker
1. Kennedy

YPOTY. Cunningham

 

[RW]

BTW - Who's managing the total counts and leaderboard this year?

I believe scaryness is

 

[The King!]

5 Goodes
4 hannebery
3 jack
2 bird
1 smith

Ypoty lloyd

 

[kickthething]

5. Hanners
4. Kennedy
3. Jack
2. Rampe
1. Bird

YPOTY Cunningham

 

[scaryness]

I believe scaryness is

I could make a leaderboard in text. If anyone wants to make a table in photoshop or something that would be much better. I think AG used to do a pretty nice table that was stickyed.

 

[scaryness]

5 - Hannebery
4 - Kennedy
3 - Jack
2 - McGlynn
1 - Laidler

YP: Lloyd

 

[Dangas]

5. Hanners
4. Kizza
3. Parks
2. Joey
1. Eski

Y. Cunners

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

 

[The Swans Blog]

I could make a leaderboard in text. If anyone wants to make a table in photoshop or something that would be much better. I think AG used to do a pretty nice table that was stickyed.

Probably a google spreadsheet embedded

 

[Jeffers]

5. Hannebery
4. Jack
3. Kennedy
2. Malceski
1. Parker

YPOTY Cunningham

 

[The Swans Blog]

To be honest I don't even know who our best were, I think Hanners & Rampe & Kennedy had good games again and Shaw was productive if not a little off with his disposals.

Once Reid & Tippet & Goodes are all back in the starting lineup, I don't think we'll see as much bomb it long bullshit.

Good to see Derrickx getting better.

 

[Ed_Gein]

5: D.Hannebery
4: K.Jack
3. L.Parker
2. JPK
1. Grundy, for not flopping around like a seal.

YPOTY: Cunningham.

 

[bedford]

5 HANNERS
4 SHAW
3 JACK
2 RICHARDS
1 GRUNDY

cant believe there is no love for Shaw

 

[MF]

5 HANNERS
4 SHAW
3 JACK
2 RICHARDS
1 GRUNDY

cant believe there is no love for Shaw

Yeah, I thought he was very very good with the exception of a couple of shanked kicks.

 

[MF]

5. Hanneberry
4. Kennedy
3. Parker
2. Jack
1. Shaw

Ypoty - Cunningham

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

[MarkP]

5. Hanners
4. Parker
3. Jack
2. Grundy
1. Goodes

YP - Harry

 

[bedford]

With all due respect, putting Goodes in makes a joke of this

 

[RW]

Yeah don't know about putting Goodes there but I found it a hard game to assess best players, I guess people overlook the backline sometimes but they did keep the opposition to five goals and I thought they combined a lot better as a unit.

 

[MarkP]

With all due respect, putting Goodes in makes a joke of this

Came in off the bench, had an impact, straightened us up, did some good things, impacted the scoreboard

What more can you expect from the sub? Did his role to a better standard than I have seen for a while.

/shrug

 

[bedford]

Yeah don't know about putting Goodes there but I found it a hard game to assess best players, I guess people overlook the backline sometimes but they did keep the opposition to five goals and I thought they combined a lot better as a unit.

The backline were very good all night. As for Goodes he had 5 possies and that's not worth a vote over someone like Shaw who was good all night and had 34, he did have 4 clangers, but KJ had 6