Remove this Banner Ad

Rule Changes - More power to the men in white!!!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Max Leader

Premiership Player
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Posts
3,401
Reaction score
2,308
Location
Kaniva
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Kaniva
The two laws to be introduced are as follows:

a) A free kick can now be awarded for deliberate rushed behinds - the benefit of the doubt will be given to the defender;

b) Umpires to award a 25 m penalty against players who tackle, hold or make high contact against an opponent after the opponent has disposed of the football, for the purpose of preventing them from taking part in the next contest;


VAFA CEO Michael Sholly said in support of the deliberate rushed behind rule, “We believe this will lead to an even more exciting, continuous and fluent brand of football. The VAFA fully support the inclusion of both laws as it is a fundamental of our game to keep the ball in the play as the main objective. The VAFA has a responsibility to our umpires and our players who aspire to play at a higher level to learn this new skill.”

The trend of deliberate rushed behinds in recent seasons has increased at AFL and VAFA level and the board wishes to discourage this tactic.

“The VAFA tend to mirror AFL strategies whether it is defensive zones, huddles, etc, in our game play. While some might view that in the VAFA we may not see the rule as an issue, we want to be proactive and stop it before it becomes one,” said Michael.

The introduction of a 25 metre penalty, in addition to a free kick, for a player held or dragged down after he had disposed of the ball, was to head off a growing trend whereby players were being taken to ground to prevent them from being involved in the next act of play.

“The VAFA agrees with the AFL that a player has a right to contest without obstruction” Michael added.

VAFA Operations Manager Brian Goodman explained “With four weeks until the first bounce, we as an umpiring group will be diligent in educating our umpires in regard to interpretation of both these laws. We will be encouraging our umpires to enforce these laws to VAFA clubs commencing in practice matches this weekend.”
 
Can't wait for the interpretation of umpires doing under 19 section violet or D4 games.
Imagine the ressi umpires abusing the deliberate rule?
 
Thank GOD!!! Another job well done by the ammo execs.....
I was sick of teams using the rolling zone only to rush behinds when under pressure....
Surely, they should let the umps concentrate on the stuff they are having trouble with at the moment i.e: the basic rules....
 
The two laws to be introduced are as follows:

a) A free kick can now be awarded for deliberate rushed behinds - the benefit of the doubt will be given to the defender;

b) Umpires to award a 25 m penalty against players who tackle, hold or make high contact against an opponent after the opponent has disposed of the football, for the purpose of preventing them from taking part in the next contest;


VAFA CEO Michael Sholly said in support of the deliberate rushed behind rule, “We believe this will lead to an even more exciting, continuous and fluent brand of football. The VAFA fully support the inclusion of both laws as it is a fundamental of our game to keep the ball in the play as the main objective. The VAFA has a responsibility to our umpires and our players who aspire to play at a higher level to learn this new skill.”

The trend of deliberate rushed behinds in recent seasons has increased at AFL and VAFA level and the board wishes to discourage this tactic.

“The VAFA tend to mirror AFL strategies whether it is defensive zones, huddles, etc, in our game play. While some might view that in the VAFA we may not see the rule as an issue, we want to be proactive and stop it before it becomes one,” said Michael.

The introduction of a 25 metre penalty, in addition to a free kick, for a player held or dragged down after he had disposed of the ball, was to head off a growing trend whereby players were being taken to ground to prevent them from being involved in the next act of play.

“The VAFA agrees with the AFL that a player has a right to contest without obstruction” Michael added.

VAFA Operations Manager Brian Goodman explained “With four weeks until the first bounce, we as an umpiring group will be diligent in educating our umpires in regard to interpretation of both these laws. We will be encouraging our umpires to enforce these laws to VAFA clubs commencing in practice matches this weekend.”

I do not agree with the Rush Behind rule, especially at D4 level.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The trend of deliberate rushed behinds in recent seasons has increased at AFL and VAFA level and the board wishes to discourage this tactic.

“The VAFA tend to mirror AFL strategies whether it is defensive zones, huddles, etc, in our game play. While some might view that in the VAFA we may not see the rule as an issue, we want to be proactive and stop it before it becomes one,” said Michael.

So which one is it Sholly?

Talk about trying to cover both bases, saying it's increased on one hand, but it's not an issue yet on the other...
 
Is it 1 April already?

Are they seriously going to provide ammo umpires with more grey areas to make a decision???
Can't wait for the first umpy to pin a bloke for a dubious deliberate rushed behind that determines the result of a game. Already happens with out of bounds when 'home ground' decisions are made in close games.
Please this is not a problem in the VAFA!!!
 
Thank GOD!!! Another job well done by the ammo execs.....
I was sick of teams using the rolling zone only to rush behinds when under pressure....
Surely, they should let the umps concentrate on the stuff they are having trouble with at the moment i.e: the basic rules....

JAF - I'm sorry about this spray but you must be kidding, rolling zones in the ammos, mate you've been reading too much press. Most teams can't even get their zone defence right!

I hope u r not an umpire because your lack of understanbding about teams that get to train for 3 hours per week at the most is appaliling.

Wake up and get real, another pathetic effort by the executive to portray their relevance. Why don't they just ping the teams they know are paying players if they want to make a statement!
 
Justafan was taking the piss mate.

We had the head of the umpires down last week and asked about any new rules. He mentioned the 25m rule which I think has some merit, however the rushed behind rule was never mentioned.

Even more perplexing considering we dont have automatic kick ins. No advantage when you have to wait for the goal umpire to waive the flag. Strange one this one. How many of these are going to be called incorrectly. Would have been nice to have had a couple of months to practice it. Great rule in AFL but imagine it in the lower grades or the reserves. Coaches meeting on monday night. I wonder what is going to be the main focus of that night. Have a feeling there will be a lot of unhappy people at the G on monday night.
 
JAF - I'm sorry about this spray but you must be kidding, rolling zones in the ammos, mate you've been reading too much press. Most teams can't even get their zone defence right!

I hope u r not an umpire because your lack of understanbding about teams that get to train for 3 hours per week at the most is appaliling.

Wake up and get real, another pathetic effort by the executive to portray their relevance. Why don't they just ping the teams they know are paying players if they want to make a statement!


Please, please, please tell me this was a joke.....
 
Thank GOD!!! Another job well done by the ammo execs.....
I was sick of teams using the rolling zone only to rush behinds when under pressure....
Surely, they should let the umps concentrate on the stuff they are having trouble with at the moment i.e: the basic rules....
:thumbsu::thumbsu:a Sausage GOLD
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom