Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How so?
He's the Director of High Performance.
It's a broad role, but IMO he'd be in charge of the creation and maintenance of an environment in which elite athletes can thrive. Injury management would be one facet, but mindset, motivation, training standards, strength and conditioning would all sit under that same umbrella, as would other aspects.
Can you explain what he is responsible for?So we are now stating that he is responsible for a player's mindset and intent on gameday?
That's a real stretch
Is he also responsible for players missing targets by foot and hand, shots at goal, playing from behind, not body checking opponents, etc?
Can you explain what he is responsible for?
My understanding would be he is responsible for our fitness, rehabilitation program
My understanding would be he is responsible for our fitness, rehabilitation program
Doesn't get a tick for Walsh from me. He has to reign in over- trainers like Walsh. He doesnt, he over did it and his back gave way. Manage their work load FFS. Basic stuff.So taking into account those parameters - and cutting him some slack for the pre Voss era where he may have been overruled by Liddle and Teague - he is still responsible for the following disasters:
- the fitness program that has seen us have an unprecedented number of soft tissue injuries over a 2 and a half year period and in 2024 in particular
- Cerra re-injuring his hamstring in the same season two years in a row
- Martin having multiple re-injuries of his calf over the last 2 and a half years
- Marchbank and Cuningham taking over 18 months to come back from ACL injuries when the industry standard is 12 months
On that basis I’ll also give him a win for managing Walsh’s back injury to the extent it hasn’t compromised our chances of success and getting Charlie back playing consistently well for the last 2 and a half years which has significantly increased our chances of success.
IMO there’s more negatives than positives from the above to support the view that he has failed in his role and he should be sacked at the end of the year.
Some people are genetically more inclined to have back issues. While I do agree he could’ve been managed better, it’s hard to say he’s the reason Walsh had back issuesDoesn't get a tick for Walsh from me. He has to reign in over- trainers like Walsh. He doesnt, he over did it and his back gave way. Manage their work load FFS. Basic stuff.
So taking into account those parameters - and cutting him some slack for the pre Voss era where he may have been overruled by Liddle and Teague - he is still responsible for the following disasters:
- the fitness program that has seen us have an unprecedented number of soft tissue injuries over a 2 and a half year period and in 2024 in particular
- Cerra re-injuring his hamstring in the same season two years in a row
- Martin having multiple re-injuries of his calf over the last 2 and a half years
- Marchbank and Cuningham taking over 18 months to come back from ACL injuries when the industry standard is 12 months
On that basis I’ll also give him a win for managing Walsh’s back injury to the extent it hasn’t compromised our chances of success and getting Charlie back playing consistently well for the last 2 and a half years which has significantly increased our chances of success.
IMO there’s more negatives than positives from the above to support the view that he has failed in his role and he should be sacked at the end of the year.
Bit more to the role than that I think.
High Performance Sport Manager | ACPE Career Guide
Explore the role of a High Performance Sport Manager. Learn about responsibilities, skills needed, and how ACPE prepares you for a career in sports management.acpe.edu.au
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
My response was more to understand why someone was blaming Russell for a players mentally capacity and level of gameday intent
It seems that the HPM works with other staff in regards to the mental side of the sport, so the club psychologist also comes under his auspices. It's an over-arching role. Make sure all the pieces are in place and make sure the need to use them is identified and followed up.
I'd say Voss is responsible for motivation in game day and Russell is responsible for getting players to trust in their bodied and in their pain thresholds. As we know, players have to go beyond what they think they are capable of all the time, despite their brain screaming at them to stop.
This is part of the list of the number of games players have missed since the start of 2022. Remove ACLs and inherited injured players. Not many soft tissue injuries
Zac Williams - 28 ACL majority
Caleb Marchbank - 21 Injury prone
Jack Martin - 20^ Injury prone
David Cuningham - 16^ Injury prone
Jack Silvagni - 16^ ACL majority
Sam Walsh - 15 Back majority
Sam Docherty - 14^ ACL majority
Corey Durdin - 13 Shoulder/hammy
Sam Durdin - 13^ Who knows
Alex Mirkov - 12 Heart
Jesse Motlop - 11^ Hammy
Mitch McGovern - 10 Injury prone
No doubt, but it's unusual that someone would point fault at one person when it comes to a perceived lack of intent and mental capacity of the team as a whole
It would be like crediting that same one person for our 2nd half of the season last year
Is it though or could it be technique, training, talent?It's the lack of intent, same as last year before some brutal player honesty
I'm not sure if that was the message there or not. It seems that Russell has a role that's all encompassing though and I don't know if we can absolve everyone because they have overlapping roles, or because we can't put our finger on exactly where it's falling down.
If we can't figure it out, is it better to do something or do nothing? Do nothing and logically, it's more inclined to stay the same. Do something and it could get worse or it could get better.
The next step is to remove the always injured players from the equation and see where we end up. If the problem persists, we have a design flaw.
Is it though or could it be technique, training, talent?
A few videos have popped up in my feed recently of clubs working with MMA trainers who are training them in breaking the tackles.
Now every club prioritises certain skills, it’s possible some clubs just don’t train and practice it as much
Does anyone know if in the past, Cook was ruthless enough to make changes at his previous clubs.
It’s clear to me he likes continuity in certain roles but did he shuffle the magnets behind the scenes?
I would be staggered if the club wasn’t aware of the cause of our injury issues, it shouldn’t be hard, what they’re doing about it, will be impossible to tell, they aren’t going to come out and throw people under the bus
We cut Philp.They say there is no reason for it. We did say last year that we were going to address durability issues, but we didn't lose any of the always injured guys, and we didn't do much to replace them.