TheClokes
Cancelled
Is he in our best side still?
I, personally think his finished...
I, personally think his finished...
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Tarkyn Lockyer
- Thread starter TheClokes
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Yep. He's barometer. He needs to get literally pushed out by some young talent commanding a spot for us to be on the up.Coin_Toss said:
He's not as bad as most knockers suggest. Handy.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Banned
- #5
FIGJAM said:
I personally think that Tarkyn Lockyer's position will be overtaken by a new up and comer in Heath Shaw. He can be played back and also in midfield/Wing.
This_was_smith
FIGJAM said:
Same applies for Licuria Davis Lonie and O'Bree. None are that bad that they should be delisted, but all need to be superceded via natural attrition in the next year or two.
- Banned
- #7
I don't think the word "accountable" is in Lockyer's vocabulary. Over the last few years he has gotten worse and plays as close to his opponent as Jason does.
To really have a good list they should have been traded on the basis they need to be superseded. Get what return you can because they aren’t likely to be in a 22 that wins a flag. If that makes us take a step backwards to go forward then that’s AFL in the modern era.Timmy from Thomastown said:
Timmy from Thomastown said:
agree with licuria. lonie was never that good but is the run and bounce player we lack and would love to get a better version of. davis on the other hand was in career best form before he got injured this season. if he can re capture that he's not done.
lockyer is still handy and until someone steps up to replace him i dont mind him being in th team but he will get superceded in next few seasons. he's not suited to modern football. he's not tall at 178cm, he's not quick... the game has outgrown his types unfortnately. the game no demands super speed or heigt and preferebly both. not expecting to see many lockyer types in the future
My side for 2007, Round 1
B: N Maxwell, S Prestigiacomo, H Shaw
HB: R Lonie, J Clement, B Johnson
C: D Thomas, D Swan, R Shaw
HF: N Buckley, T Cloke, C Egan
F: L Davis, A Rocca, S Rusling
Foll: J Fraser, S O'Bree, P Licuria
I/C: S Pendlebury, S Wakelin, S Burns, G Richards
EM: B Davies, T Lockyer, H O'Brien
N/A: A Didak, B Holland
I think with the two improvers of 2006, being Heath Shaw and Dane Swan, have kicked him out of our best 22 (18 atleast). He had a very good first half of the year did Tarkyn, but in the second half got exposed more with his lack of pace, decline in skills and definately as a one-on-one small defender.
B: N Maxwell, S Prestigiacomo, H Shaw
HB: R Lonie, J Clement, B Johnson
C: D Thomas, D Swan, R Shaw
HF: N Buckley, T Cloke, C Egan
F: L Davis, A Rocca, S Rusling
Foll: J Fraser, S O'Bree, P Licuria
I/C: S Pendlebury, S Wakelin, S Burns, G Richards
EM: B Davies, T Lockyer, H O'Brien
N/A: A Didak, B Holland
I think with the two improvers of 2006, being Heath Shaw and Dane Swan, have kicked him out of our best 22 (18 atleast). He had a very good first half of the year did Tarkyn, but in the second half got exposed more with his lack of pace, decline in skills and definately as a one-on-one small defender.
- Aug 11, 2006
- 8,662
- 4,672
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Lonie_from_50 said:
did you forget the king?
Medhurst not in our best 22! (Not even in Freo's best 22, will wait and see!)
Clarke is too good for our best 22!
Clarke is too good for our best 22!
Problem is that is the sort of list management strategy we have employed in the past and it doesn’t help building a top end list. Sheedy is the master at getting returns for hacks and serviceable players. The biggest issue is timing.barwick said:
goalpie
Premiership Player
Tarks is ok.