- Banned
- #1
With the new government the new stadium will be looked at again.
Maybe that's a good thing .Maybe they'll delete the all purpose aspect of the stadium and save about $200 million . The Telstra dome is hardly ever configured in the rectangular mode and MES is never filled .
So let's refresh. If Subiaco is OK for a site, then what's wrong with Claremont? Both the WAFL ground and the showgrounds have the space
and the train lines .And if you have to have public transport then what's wrong building it in suburbs that really want it?
Maybe that's a good thing .Maybe they'll delete the all purpose aspect of the stadium and save about $200 million . The Telstra dome is hardly ever configured in the rectangular mode and MES is never filled .
So let's refresh. If Subiaco is OK for a site, then what's wrong with Claremont? Both the WAFL ground and the showgrounds have the space
and the train lines .And if you have to have public transport then what's wrong building it in suburbs that really want it?



