Remove this Banner Ad

Tivendale?

  • Thread starter Thread starter strauchy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

its funny how the same people who were pumping up tivendale and hyde last week are no where to be seen this week

difference is that we actually played a good side this week and not a rabble, so it was not suprising those 2 front runners had zero impact

ahhhhh you gotta love it
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

its funny how the same people who were pumping up tivendale and hyde last week are no where to be seen this week

difference is that we actually played a good side this week and not a rabble, so it was not suprising those 2 front runners had zero impact

ahhhhh you gotta love it

Tivendale is just a mature Fiora. Looks like the goods when his team wins, but is nowhere to be found when they are struggling.

Hyde on the other hand isn't that bad. Sure, the defensive side of his game is almost non-existant, but IMO his evasive skills and his run and carry is probably in the top 5 at the club.
 
He cops a lot but hasn't been bad. Has played 11 games aveaging 20 disposals. But the fact is he is 28. Getting old. The desision needs to be made this year. We could get something OK for him. :)
 
he played well against the dees, but along with sugar was worse than crap v the aints

tivendale shoudl have been delisted last yr , if he remains on our list next yr he wont get a game, kids like edwards, peterson, jon, connors will all get a game ahead of him

tivendale = dogsh it
 
Never ever have been a Tivvo fan... ever!

But as l said in a past thread, our list is SO bad that there are 8 people who are worse than him and need turning over first. Which means he keeps his spot.

Not Tivendales fault, but just a clear example of where we're at. We are so far behind cutting it, its not funny.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

its funny how the same people who were pumping up tivendale and hyde last week are no where to be seen this week

difference is that we actually played a good side this week and not a rabble, so it was not suprising those 2 front runners had zero impact

ahhhhh you gotta love it

like i said, with irrelevant players you are automatically playing with 20 rather than with 22. Good luck to them, the stars were aligned and they just happened to start their careers in a side that suited their class and skill.
It gets evenfunnier though, you have others suggesting that the tivs, petts and hydes only need good players around them and they will shine. Well with Petts, we can safely say that browny has given him a leg up, BIg ****ing deal. So we then are in the situation that when browny is out we are 3 short. 1 Brown, 2 the extra forward that Brown created and 3 the irrelevant Pettifer, because he now is de man and becomes the cat. ;)
 
well if we go by terrys "youth policy" then techincally he should be gone by next year because hes not one of our solid senior players like that of bowden and richo,however i think he should stay on hes been in our top 8-10 this season.

btw this is my first post :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom