Post BF Upgrade Feedback - Click Here

Remove this Banner Ad

Ty

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Tanty by Ty said:
What is you opinion of Ty Zantuck?
Click to expand...
Whats this! Some new found respect for another reject richmond hack?

You want to hope Sheeds gives him a short leash.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Could be good for the Bombers, and I was a little dissapointed things didnt work out at Richmond for him. May have a Laurence Angwin-type alter ego happenin, but if anyone can get rid of that, it's Sheeds.

Will be a bargain pick up for you guys and has the talent to be in Essendons best 10-15 list.
 
But Crackerjack.. Blumfield couldnt even get a game with us.. Sheedy doesnt let genuine talent go... Blumfield is/was a dud of the highest order.
 
blumfield was more like injury of the highest order plus frawley couldn't even play him right. coz when blummers with the dons he was a gun, zantuck just couldn't get a game coz he was useless
 
What Injury are you talking of that let him play for Coburg but wouldn't allow him to be in Richmonds best 22 in a wooden spoon year?

Face it dude, he's crap! You're dreaming of some fairy flossed past, and believe me Zantuck will be in your sides best 15 in 2005. (Presuming your coacj can keep him off the horse pills)
 
SaveFeriss said:
What Injury are you talking of that let him play for Coburg but wouldn't allow him to be in Richmonds best 22 in a wooden spoon year?

Face it dude, he's crap! You're dreaming of some fairy flossed past, and believe me Zantuck will be in your sides best 15 in 2005. (Presuming your coacj can keep him off the horse pills)
Click to expand...
that would be danny frawleys pathetic coaching i mean if he can coach them to a spoon he can just about make any other stupid decision
 
Well usually Id agree, but one thing he got right is keeping Blummers at Cobrug. No use him adding to the ******** that was Richmond 2004.
 
Im with Feriss here.. Kinda.
No way would i have wanted Blumfield over Zantuck.
It was sad to see injuries take away so much from Blummas, but the fact is it happened. He didnt achieve anything in his years at Richmond, and there was no saying once he got back to Windy Hill that hed recover his long lost form.

Was sad not to see another club pick him up, but his experience with the young guys in the VFL will be invaluable.

Despite falling out with the team, Zantuck still played 14 games for the season, (probably would have played more if not for the tribuneral)

I dont know about being in our best 15, but i would say best 22 at the moment. Cant wait to see how he goes. Zantuck is 23 at the start of next year, alot younger than Blumfield.
As Sheedy said it came down to what they could give to the club, he saw Zantuck as a potential 100 game player (could play more), and Blumfield as only a 50.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think Zantuck under Sheeds will develop into a really handy defender. He's still pretty young, give him a year or so under the master coach.
 
He'll set the backline on fire and you Richmond *supporters* or velcro membership holders will be spitting it again!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

yeh i think zantuck is atcally a good player but needs to work on his skills
 
Tanty by Ty said:
He'll set the backline on fire and you Richmond *supporters* or velcro membership holders will be spitting it again!
Click to expand...

only thing i don't like about Zantuck is he didn't get his "friends" to blow up Richmond once he had left there
 
I've seen him play some really good football in patches, back and forward. As is the problem with many a footballer, he has to develop consistency.
 
Bolt said:
I've seen him play some really good football in patches, back and forward. As is the problem with many a footballer, he has to develop consistency.
Click to expand...
agree with that.. but he was playing with Richmond before.. so yeah might explaing a fair bit
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top