Warnock update: According to Denham

[Blue Dawn]

...on this board anyway.

Heaps of comments in this thread to bookmark for after trade week.

Buddy this entire f@#ken board rocks! Boookmark the lot of it will you!?

 

[Stig O'Hara]

Sorry,
dulled out of the whole thing,

Grand Final day now.

Watch this bloke,
he did many things on this famous day,
here are 2.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3WDa96XYog

I met this bloke once,
and nearly fainted, honestly.
Best goddam day of my life.

 

[dominguez]

The downside of these very talls is that they lack versatility, and can be a liability after the centre bounce.

Cox is 2cm shorter than Warnock.

 

[dominguez]

I actually heard from someone associated with the club in the Carlton Mafia (unofficial match committee) the latest rumour going around is that it is going to be pick 24 and Browne for Warnock and Freo's 3rd round draft pick, which makes sense ....

Unlikely, that would be pick 24 and Browne for Warnock and pick 37. If pick 37 is included the Blues will probably also be adding pick 40 or atleast pick 56.

 

[thylacine60]

Cox is 2cm shorter than Warnock.

Think he's in a rut?

 

[Blue Dawn]

Unlikely, that would be pick 24 and Browne for Warnock and pick 37. If pick 37 is included the Blues will probably also be adding pick 40 or atleast pick 56.

For the upteenth time Dom you won't be getting more than #24 (maybe Benjamin if you want him). That wouldn't be fair compo in a weak draft but this is a strong draft and the last uncompromised one for some time so #24 for Warnock is pretty close to the mark.

Otherwise let him walk to the Dees and we'll take care of a more pressing structural weakness of ours and take Johnston (if very lucky), Rockliff or Lisle.

 

[parrot]

No way! There are very high hopes for Browne and i very much liked what i saw this year from a first year kid. Be furious if this deal went ahead. Warnock is NOT worth more than #24 in a strong draft, not to us anyway as we have two talented emerging long-term ruck propositions.

Nicely said. Agree 110%.

 

[celtic_pride]

F$^$%^% Gold Coast coming in, if the expansion club wasn't coming in, this trade would have gone though far more smoothly and with far less complications ...

I blame Vlad and his 'commie' cronies for hoarding all the future picks to GC17 ...

 

[Bluebear]

...on this board anyway.

Heaps of comments in this thread to bookmark for after trade week.

Maybe you should be more concerned with your own board.

Direct swap Bower for Warnock?
Bwahahahahaha.......GOLD!

You want one of the only defenders to have been able to run with Buddy all year, for a guy who has beaten.......who exactly?

Ackland?

If we start going for Kerr, and pull out of the Warnock race, what say you then?

Run along.

 

[Athomas]

Maybe you should be more concerned with your own board.

Direct swap Bower for Warnock?
Bwahahahahaha.......GOLD!

You want one of the only defenders to have been able to run with Buddy all year, for a guy who has beaten.......who exactly?

Ackland?

If we start going for Kerr, and pull out of the Warnock race, what say you then?

Run along.

Dude, Bower for Warnock is a fair trade. You can't get something for nothing.

 

[Bluebear]

Dude, Bower for Warnock is a fair trade. You can't get something for nothing.

Describe fair?

We have a young unproven athletic ruckman in our team - Hampson. Anyting else said about Warnock is hope. Nothing more. Maybe he WILL turn into the next Sandialnds (hopefully better), but maybe he will be the next Burton.

Bower has more value to us than another young ruck, simply because we don't have the depth of KPP defeners.

If you look at stats, experience etc then yes, you may call it a fair trade, but we have got a defender capable of taking on one of the games best young forwards........do we really value that the same as someone who MIGHT be "a bit" better than Hampson?