Yianni
Norm Smith Medallist
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2001
- Posts
- 6,694
- Reaction score
- 6,358
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- S.A Spurs, Liverpool
I have Bluetooth on my PDA and my friend has bluetooth on his telephone. Using it, he can send me files and I can send him files and it costs us nothing. Presumably, we could also have digital telephone conversations if we were within Bluetooth range and this would also cost us nothing.
At the moment, this is impractical, because Bluetooth range is only about 40 metres. However I have read of a new wi-fi protocol whose range is about 60 KILOMETRES.
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but if I can form a wireless network with any of my friends within 60km, then I can have free telephone conversations with them, send them files for free, etc. This would seem to make using say Telstra or Optus's networks obsolete for this purpose.
My friend was telling me how Kodak is almost going out of business now because of how much digital cameras have cut into their profit margins (they used to make most of their money from film)
This shows me that technology, as it always does, makes certain things cheaper for people to do and often drives businesses bankrupt because of it.
What do people think about this, both the above examples and any other examples that you can think of. For example, what will the effect of everyone having video cameras in their phones or video cameras the size of golf balls be on say broadcast rights of sports.
If I'm at the cricket and my mates can't get there, surely I can just pull my camera out and stream them a live video feed of it to them. Maybe this will cost a lot now, but in 5 years it will be almost free.
Comments?
At the moment, this is impractical, because Bluetooth range is only about 40 metres. However I have read of a new wi-fi protocol whose range is about 60 KILOMETRES.
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but if I can form a wireless network with any of my friends within 60km, then I can have free telephone conversations with them, send them files for free, etc. This would seem to make using say Telstra or Optus's networks obsolete for this purpose.
My friend was telling me how Kodak is almost going out of business now because of how much digital cameras have cut into their profit margins (they used to make most of their money from film)
This shows me that technology, as it always does, makes certain things cheaper for people to do and often drives businesses bankrupt because of it.
What do people think about this, both the above examples and any other examples that you can think of. For example, what will the effect of everyone having video cameras in their phones or video cameras the size of golf balls be on say broadcast rights of sports.
If I'm at the cricket and my mates can't get there, surely I can just pull my camera out and stream them a live video feed of it to them. Maybe this will cost a lot now, but in 5 years it will be almost free.
Comments?








