Whitnall

[big_sav]

wat are ur guys opinion on whitnall's position at the club

 

[Fevalenko25]

Whitnall=Champ

 

[gandaal]

If we're offered a trade we just couldn't refuse than sure trade him but otherwise I'd just put him on an average sized contract for two years and treat him like just one of the boys instead of a star which he's clearly not.

 

[stokesy]

If we're offered a trade we just couldn't refuse than sure trade him but otherwise I'd just put him on an average sized contract for two years and treat him like just one of the boys instead of a star which he's clearly not.

I agree with the trade bit, if there is a good enough trade offered, then do it.

If not, keep him.

 

[pumped]

I feel we should only trade Lance if we get a very good trade. In fact I believe it would have to be a top 5 pick in the draft or a player who is present top 50-75. I feel that given where Lances' public image is at the moment that there is no way we will receive anything like this for him.

As such I really believe we would be best holding onto Lance. I think we should leave him at CHF or even time at FF. I feel that this season he has been as committed as any in our side to the contest. So long as he puts his body on the line and takes some heat bringing the ball to the ground he is valueable to us.

If we leave him forward regularly then I believe he will still have some big games. In the others he will still be solid if we show him some faith.

 

[Mentallo]

If the right offer comes along trade him.

 

[Go BlUez!!]

Smart player, but he has to go.

 

[Free Willy]

We need to load up on as many 1st round picks as possible.
Sadly...........Lance should be traded, but only for a top 6 pick (were dreaming), or to a side desperate enough for a KP forward willing to give up a eg. Kerr & 2nd round pick (come on WCE ).

 

[Blues_Man]

trade him for the right offer ..but don't give him away . if he stays he stays on a salary package more befitting his ranking in the game

 

[Eddie19]

What about for daniel kerr

 

[iluvparis]

He should have been traded at the end of the last 2 or even 3 seasons and his value has just got progressively worse. He HAS to go this year for whatever we can get for him.

 

[gothemightyblues]

What about for daniel kerr

sure y not whichever pays me the most

 

[Snoozer]

Why the F*** would west coast want Whitnall?? Are you sure he'd fit into their fast, free-flowing style of footy?? Somehow I doubt it.

Only a crap team with no prospects would want him.... I guess thats us.

 

[Kooley]

Why the F*** would west coast want Whitnall?? Are you sure he'd fit into their fast, free-flowing style of footy?? Somehow I doubt it.

Only a crap team with no prospects would want him.... I guess thats us.

I would hate to be playing in the forward line in our team. Fevola proved what a star he is with the amount of opportunities he actually got. Does anyone know our inside 50's from yesterday? They must have been low.

 

[TheReason]

Why the F*** would west coast want Whitnall?? Are you sure he'd fit into their fast, free-flowing style of footy?? Somehow I doubt it.

Only a crap team with no prospects would want him.... I guess thats us.

Right on the money

Whitnall Circa 99 / 00 was a very very good player and looked like he was going to be the premier CHF for another decade.

ATM, trade value = Jack Squat. Seriously, you'd be looking at maybe a Round 4 and the team getting him would classify Whitnall as a Project Player.

Seriously, if the Eagles nabbed him, he will be a special project player... i.e. let him play 3 times a year on a smaller away ground like SCG & Telstra Dome and the remainder of the year, let him play in the WAFL.

No thanks.