I'll preface this by saying I don't want to lose Warnock but wouldn't be peeved if he left to pursue greater opportunities. We do a disservice to the player and wear a hole in our salary cap at the same time.
Walk out to GWS and get what? A compensation pick at the end of the first round worth pick 20ish if others exercise their rights? This is one of the strongest drafts for 3 years and the prospect of getting a quality 10-year midfielder with the Magpies´ first pick (around 14) doesn't seem too bad a deal. You have to give up quality to get quality.
No. We give a huge leg up to our hated rival, and weaken our own list. If he wants to walk, he goes to GWS, and we get good compensation.
Walk out to GWS and get what? A compensation pick at the end of the first round worth pick 20ish if others exercise their rights? This is one of the strongest drafts for 3 years and the prospect of getting a quality 10-year midfielder with the Magpies´ first pick (around 14) doesn't seem too bad a deal. You have to give up quality to get quality.
Which is why you make a call on Casboult (who rucked during the NAB) and, as I said grab one of the Pies raw 20 year olds in exchange. I feel regardless of whether or 3 rucks stay, we should get a quality 18 year old ruck prospect to develop for the next phase of our dynasty for 2016.The only time that Kreuzer, Hampson and Warnock have been fit and in form at the same time is, NEVER.
Good luck with that. I suspect no club in the league would pay that for a plodder with a history of injuries, however sublime his tapwork would be.On the trade table he is worth a top 10 pick at a minimum.







